Today's hottest deals

MSI MAG B550 TOMAHAWK (MS-7C91)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 51%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 97%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 46%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 102%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics46.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C91
MotherboardMSI MAG B550 TOMAHAWK (MS-7C91)  (all builds)
Memory9 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210729
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateSep 04 '21 at 17:37
Run Duration250 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 570 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X-$130
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.55 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
102% Outstanding
Memory 91.1
1-Core 160
2-Core 311
102% 187 Pts
4-Core 602
8-Core 916
94% 759 Pts
64-Core 1,128
70% 1,128 Pts
Poor: 83%
This bench: 102%
Great: 107%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 570-$170
CLim: 1286 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 21.6.1
Performing below potential (69th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
46.3% Average
Lighting 58.3
Reflection 60.1
Parallax 79.8
48% 66.1 fps
MRender 60
Gravity 60.9
Splatting 44.6
44% 55.2 fps
Poor: 37%
This bench: 46.3%
Great: 49%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$140
298GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 11,817
Write 7,478
Mixed 8,959
2,087% 9,418 MB/s
4K Read 682
4K Write 434
4K Mixed 338
1,696% 485 MB/s
DQ Read 1,653
DQ Write 1,247
DQ Mixed 1,326
1,025% 1,409 MB/s
Poor: 81% Great: 133%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$30
115GB free
Firmware: 02.01A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 101 101 109 98 96 94 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
59.6% Above average
Read 107
Write 115
Mixed 72.4
SusWrite 99.8
73% 98.6 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1.1
221% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 59.6%
Great: 109%
WD My Book 25ED 4TB
970GB free, PID 25ed
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 119 119 119 118 118 118 MB/s
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
84.9% Excellent
Read 136
Write 118
Mixed 95.3
SusWrite 118
156% 117 MB/s
4K Read 14.4
4K Write 11.7
4K Mixed 1.2
492% 9.1 MB/s
DQ Read 0.6
DQ Write 11.7
DQ Mixed 0.9
431% 4.4 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 84.9%
Great: 110%
WD My Book 500GB
463GB free, PID 1100
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 41 42 42 42 42 42 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
22.1% Poor
Read 40.4
Write 40.2
Mixed 30.4
SusWrite 41.5
52% 38.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.6
100% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 22.1%
Great: 22%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
94.3% Outstanding
MC Read 40.7
MC Write 23.9
MC Mixed 35.4
95% 33.3 GB/s
SC Read 30.9
SC Write 24.1
SC Mixed 37.1
88% 30.7 GB/s
Latency 65.6
61% 65.6 ns
Poor: 54%
This bench: 94.3%
Great: 108%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 12: 2R 0G 2B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
12% 17% 23 110 6 60 23" 1920 1080 ACI23D2 ASUS VS239
Typical MAG B550 TOMAHAWK (MS-7C91) Builds (Compare 18,178 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 142%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI MAG B550 TOMAHAWK (MS-7C91) - $120

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 91% - Outstanding Total price: $876
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $230Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback