Today's hottest deals

Amazon z1d.xlarge

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot Drive19.3% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemAmazon z1d.xlarge  (all builds)
MotherboardAmazon
Memory8.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20171016
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 31 '21 at 10:17
Run Duration142 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing below expectations (29th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon Platinum 8151
CPU 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
65.4% Good
Memory 74.5
1-Core 125
2-Core 223
78% 141 Pts
4-Core 326
8-Core 326
44% 326 Pts
64-Core 322
20% 322 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 65.4%
Great: 82%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme Amazon Elastic B 107GB
34GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 42 36 59 44 86 128 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
19.3% Very poor
Read 129
Write 192
Mixed 137
SusWrite 65.8
30% 131 MB/s
4K Read 12.5
4K Write 6.6
4K Mixed 8.4
33% 9.17 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 19.3%
Great: 58%
Nvme Amazon EC2 NVMe 150GB
128GB free
Firmware: 0 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 138 130 127 129 130 128 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
68.9% Good
Read 398
Write 242
Mixed 385
SusWrite 130
65% 289 MB/s
4K Read 22.5
4K Write 61.3
4K Mixed 33.3
109% 39 MB/s
DQ Read 298
DQ Write 190
DQ Mixed 243
182% 244 MB/s
Poor: 69%
This bench: 68.9%
Great: 119%
Nvme Amazon Elastic B 537GB
241GB free
Firmware: 1.0 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 51 43 70 52 126 250 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 8% Great: 88%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1x31GB
1 of 1 slots used
31GB DIMM DDR4 2666 MHz
Performing below potential (13th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
33.6% Below average
MC Read 12.8
MC Write 11.9
MC Mixed 11.2
34% 12 GB/s
SC Read 7.7
SC Write 6.6
SC Mixed 6.9
20% 7.07 GB/s
Latency 91.5
44% 91.5 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 33.6%
Great: 241%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 7 4 0 0" 1280 720
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $215Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback