Today's hottest deals

Razer Blade 15 Studio Edition (Early 2020) - RZ09-033

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 92%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 93%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics102% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive243% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemRazer Blade 15 Studio Edition (Early 2020) - RZ09-033  (all builds)
MotherboardRazer CH551
Memory24.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.9 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200720
Uptime4.9 Days
Run DateAug 31 '21 at 10:11
Run Duration128 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (69th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-10875H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 4.25 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
88.4% Excellent
Memory 81.2
1-Core 149
2-Core 286
93% 172 Pts
4-Core 512
8-Core 976
89% 744 Pts
64-Core 1,320
82% 1,320 Pts
Poor: 52%
This bench: 88.4%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro RTX 5000 with Max-Q Design
Device(1A58 200A) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 26.21.14.4345
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
102% Outstanding
Lighting 123
Reflection 146
Parallax 131
100% 134 fps
MRender 150
Gravity 119
Splatting 121
105% 130 fps
Poor: 75%
This bench: 102%
Great: 102%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme CA5-8D1024 1TB
862GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CQA0903 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1741 1819 1367 540 556 554 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
243% Outstanding
Read 1,564
Write 1,674
Mixed 1,369
SusWrite 1,096
321% 1,426 MB/s
4K Read 51.9
4K Write 109
4K Mixed 66.4
222% 75.8 MB/s
DQ Read 1134
DQ Write 879
DQ Mixed 941
722% 984 MB/s
Poor: 98%
This bench: 243%
Great: 249%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A2K43DB1-CWE 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2933 MHz
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
77% Very good
MC Read 25.4
MC Write 36.5
MC Mixed 17.1
75% 26.3 GB/s
SC Read 19.4
SC Write 38.8
SC Mixed 28.8
83% 29 GB/s
Latency 78.4
51% 78.4 ns
Poor: 72%
This bench: 77%
Great: 105%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 8 6 60 15.5" 1280 720 SDCA029
Typical Blade 15 Studio Edition (Early 2020) - RZ09-033 Builds (Compare 139 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 76%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 71%
Battleship

System: Razer Blade 15 Studio Edition (Early 2020) - RZ09-033

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $140
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i7-14700K $315Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback