Today's hottest deals

Asus X99-A II

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 50%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 47%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics48.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive310% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus X99-A II  (all builds)
Memory26.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190710
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateAug 29 '21 at 20:38
Run Duration145 Seconds
Run User DNK-User
Background CPU6%
Watch Gameplay: 2080-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6800K-$90
SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
83.4% Excellent
Memory 85.1
1-Core 112
2-Core 232
80% 143 Pts
4-Core 440
8-Core 758
72% 599 Pts
64-Core 936
58% 936 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 83.4%
Great: 90%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-Ti-$441
MSI(1462 3710) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2160 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 471.41
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Disable monitor sync before benchmarking (60 fps cap detected)
48.8% Average
Lighting 59.7
Reflection 59.8
Parallax 59.8
49% 59.8 fps
MRender 59.8
Gravity 59.8
Splatting 59.7
49% 59.8 fps
Poor: 128%
This bench: 48.8%
Great: 174%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$192
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1965 2013 1998 2104 2059 2060 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
310% Outstanding
Read 1,881
Write 1,547
Mixed 1,318
SusWrite 2033
382% 1,695 MB/s
4K Read 48.1
4K Write 108
4K Mixed 71.9
222% 75.9 MB/s
DQ Read 737
DQ Write 1,114
DQ Mixed 871
674% 907 MB/s
Poor: 278%
This bench: 310%
Great: 508%
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$234
430GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 439 450 446 459 455 455 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
111% Outstanding
Read 442
Write 416
Mixed 376
SusWrite 451
95% 421 MB/s
4K Read 32.9
4K Write 76.7
4K Mixed 51.8
157% 53.8 MB/s
DQ Read 381
DQ Write 340
DQ Mixed 359
270% 360 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 111%
Great: 133%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
HyperX Fury DDR4 2133 C14 4x8GB-$165
4 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
113% Outstanding
MC Read 41.8
MC Write 50.9
MC Mixed 41.6
128% 44.8 GB/s
SC Read 13.8
SC Write 18.8
SC Mixed 20.7
51% 17.8 GB/s
Latency 71.9
56% 71.9 ns
Poor: 63%
This bench: 113%
Great: 113%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 10 8 60 27.9" 1280 720 AUS28BA ASUS VG289
Typical X99-A II Builds (Compare 1,456 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 86%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 77%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asus X99-A II - $294

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 99% - Outstanding Total price: $664
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $215Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback