Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-Z590 AORUS ELITE

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 55%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 109%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 58%
Gunboat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 109%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics46.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive122% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-Z590 AORUS ELITE  (all builds)
Memory26.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210618
Uptime0.9 Days
Run DateAug 22 '21 at 16:11
Run Duration186 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 570 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-11900K-$270
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 5 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
109% Outstanding
Memory 83.1
1-Core 202
2-Core 400
119% 228 Pts
4-Core 716
8-Core 1,306
121% 1,011 Pts
64-Core 1,850
114% 1,850 Pts
Poor: 94%
This bench: 109%
Great: 112%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 570-$170
Sapphire(1DA2 E353) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1284 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 21.6.1
Performing below potential (69th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
46.3% Average
Lighting 58.1
Reflection 61
Parallax 78.7
47% 65.9 fps
MRender 61
Gravity 60.8
Splatting 44.7
44% 55.5 fps
Poor: 37%
This bench: 46.3%
Great: 49%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 870 QVO 2TB-$140
1TB free (System drive)
Firmware: SVQ02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 471 482 481 486 485 485 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
122% Outstanding
Read 510
Write 481
Mixed 431
SusWrite 482
107% 476 MB/s
4K Read 39
4K Write 104
4K Mixed 54
184% 65.8 MB/s
DQ Read 374
DQ Write 320
DQ Mixed 343
258% 346 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 122%
Great: 128%
WD Blue 750GB (2008)-$150
217GB free
Firmware: 30.04G30
SusWrite @10s intervals: 90 91 92 92 92 93 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
45.3% Average
Read 66
Write 62.6
Mixed 51
SusWrite 91.5
50% 67.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.8
156% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 45.3%
Great: 52%
WD Black 4TB (2013)-$175
3TB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 159 160 161 161 161 163 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
93.3% Outstanding
Read 164
Write 137
Mixed 82.2
SusWrite 161
100% 136 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 3.2
4K Mixed 0.9
201% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 93.3%
Great: 98%
WD WD30EZRS-00J99B0 3TB
74GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 58 60 60 60 60 61 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
35.1% Below average
Read 62.5
Write 58.5
Mixed 43.5
SusWrite 59.7
41% 56 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.8
146% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 35.1%
Great: 72%
WD Blue 750GB (2008)-$150
29GB free
Firmware: 30.04G30
SusWrite @10s intervals: 77 80 80 80 81 81 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
46.1% Average
Read 80.6
Write 81.1
Mixed 60.3
SusWrite 79.8
56% 75.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.9
168% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 46.1%
Great: 52%
WD Ext HDD 1021 2.5TB
432GB free, PID 1021
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 37 36 37 38 37 38 MB/s
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
18% Very poor
Read 32.4
Write 27.2
Mixed 27.8
SusWrite 37.4
42% 31.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.6
78% 1 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 18%
Great: 20%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G Skill Intl F4-3200C16-16GVK 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (24th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
76.2% Very good
MC Read 28.7
MC Write 29
MC Mixed 22.2
76% 26.6 GB/s
SC Read 23.6
SC Write 28.2
SC Mixed 25.2
73% 25.7 GB/s
Latency 74.9
53% 74.9 ns
Poor: 61%
This bench: 76.2%
Great: 113%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 8 6 60 24.1" 1280 720 SAM0587 SyncMaster
Typical GA-Z590 AORUS ELITE Builds (Compare 2,445 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 150%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 105%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 150%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z590 AORUS ELITE

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 90% - Excellent Total price: $744
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i7-14700K $355Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback