Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-X570 GAMING X

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 157%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics148% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive468% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-X570 GAMING X  (all builds)
Memory55.6 GB free of 64 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display3840 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210118
Uptime4.7 Days
Run DateAug 22 '21 at 15:51
Run Duration209 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU9%

 PC Performing below expectations (37th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 5950X-$358
AM4, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
85% Excellent
Memory 74
1-Core 152
2-Core 294
93% 174 Pts
4-Core 514
8-Core 975
89% 745 Pts
64-Core 2,464
152% 2,464 Pts
Poor: 90%
This bench: 85%
Great: 110%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3070-Ti-$499
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 471.68
Performing below potential (16th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
148% Outstanding
Lighting 215
Reflection 194
Parallax 187
175% 199 fps
MRender 229
Gravity 149
Splatting 121
131% 167 fps
Poor: 139%
This bench: 148%
Great: 170%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Amd-raid Array 1 2TB
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 9.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2720 4390 5075 5234 5147 4531 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
468% Outstanding
Read 2,466
Write 5,755
Mixed 2163
SusWrite 4,516
849% 3,725 MB/s
4K Read 30.6
4K Write 113
4K Mixed 44.9
164% 62.8 MB/s
DQ Read 1,054
DQ Write 908
DQ Mixed 999
744% 987 MB/s
Poor: 88%
This bench: 468%
Great: 448%
Amd-raid CT480BX20 480GB
225GB free
Firmware: MU01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 246 227 75 65 65 66 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
26.2% Poor
Read 304
Write 227
Mixed 254
SusWrite 124
51% 227 MB/s
4K Read 5.8
4K Write 7.1
4K Mixed 6.3
21% 6.4 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 26.2%
Great: 54%
Amd-raid CT250BX10 250GB
146GB free
Firmware: MU02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 244 233 178 169 173 172 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
30.4% Below average
Read 309
Write 243
Mixed 234
SusWrite 195
55% 245 MB/s
4K Read 4.6
4K Write 7.2
4K Mixed 6.6
19% 6.13 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 30.4%
Great: 75%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMW64GX4M4E3200C16 4x16GB
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
113% Outstanding
MC Read 64.2
MC Write 32.9
MC Mixed 33.8
125% 43.6 GB/s
SC Read 24.5
SC Write 21.6
SC Mixed 28.4
71% 24.8 GB/s
Latency 92.6
43% 92.6 ns
Poor: 65%
This bench: 113%
Great: 124%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 10 8 60 27" 1280 720 ACI2725 ASUS VG278HE
Typical GA-X570 GAMING X Builds (Compare 4,059 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X570 GAMING X

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 92% - Outstanding Total price: $746
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $390WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $85
Intel Core i5-13600K $215Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $381
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback