Today's hottest deals

Asus Z97-PRO GAMER

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 58%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 48%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics74% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (73%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus Z97-PRO GAMER  (all builds)
Memory8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160226
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 22 '21 at 06:49
Run Duration303 Seconds
Run User HKG-User
Background CPU 73%

 PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4790K-$348
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 0.8 GHz, turbo 4.4 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
80.5% Excellent
Memory 94
1-Core 126
2-Core 209
84% 143 Pts
4-Core 362
8-Core 544
56% 453 Pts
64-Core 572
35% 572 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 80.5%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 980-Ti-$449
CLim: 1392 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 471.11
Performing below potential (23rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
74% Very good
Lighting 91.4
Reflection 108
Parallax 96.5
74% 98.5 fps
MRender 93.9
Gravity 90.3
Splatting 84.9
73% 89.7 fps
Poor: 70%
This bench: 74%
Great: 87%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 PRO 128GB (TurboPC EX)
14GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXM02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 37 41 41 41 42 37 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Toshiba DT01ACA200 (TurboPC EX) 2TB
673GB free
Firmware: MX4OABB0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 51 78 76 74 74 68 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
45.2% Average
Read 87.2
Write 126
Mixed 39
SusWrite 70
59% 80.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.5
117% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 45.2%
Great: 100%
Toshiba DT01ACA200 (TurboPC EX) 2TB
277GB free
Firmware: MX4OABB0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 96 99 100 99 101 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
73.9% Very good
Read 158
Write 138
Mixed 44.2
SusWrite 99
80% 110 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.7
166% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 73.9%
Great: 100%
Toshiba DT01ACA200 (TurboPC EX) 2TB
657GB free
Firmware: MX4OABB0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 109 113 115 116 116 114 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
79.2% Very good
Read 162
Write 139
Mixed 41.4
SusWrite 114
83% 114 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.6
156% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 79.2%
Great: 100%
BUFFALO HD-LXU3 USB Device (TurboPC EX) 4TB
369GB free, PID 01f7
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 127 130 125 128 128 132 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
180% Outstanding
Read 298
Write 190
Mixed 119
SusWrite 128
225% 184 MB/s
4K Read 29
4K Write 33.3
4K Mixed 2.5
1,325% 21.6 MB/s
DQ Read 6.1
DQ Write 24.8
DQ Mixed 8.3
1,148% 13.1 MB/s
Poor: 69%
This bench: 180%
Great: 193%
BUFFALO External HDD 1.5TB
198GB free, PID 0108
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 37 31 29 27 29 28 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
13.9% Very poor
Read 17.9
Write 17.2
Mixed 25.5
SusWrite 30.1
32% 22.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.8
80% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 13.9%
Great: 20%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance Pro DDR3 1600 C9 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
56.9% Above average
MC Read 19.3
MC Write 20.8
MC Mixed 18
55% 19.4 GB/s
SC Read 14.1
SC Write 20.9
SC Mixed 16.7
49% 17.2 GB/s
Latency 59.7
67% 59.7 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 56.9%
Great: 62%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 42: 5R 4G 5B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
42% 11% 132 147 104 100 27" 1920 1080 AUS270F VG279QR
History: Score 13: 2R 0G 3B | Score 42: 5R 4G 5B
Typical Z97-PRO GAMER Builds (Compare 2,990 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asus Z97-PRO GAMER

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Above average Total price: $648
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $239Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback