Today's hottest deals

Asrock H61M-VG4

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 38%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics54.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 2 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock H61M-VG4  (all builds)
Memory11.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20130712
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 16 '21 at 09:17
Run Duration134 Seconds
Run User PHL-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (35th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3570
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
71.7% Very good
Memory 78.8
1-Core 84.3
2-Core 194
67% 119 Pts
4-Core 382
8-Core 328
49% 355 Pts
64-Core 386
24% 386 Pts
Poor: 50%
This bench: 71.7%
Great: 75%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 471.11
Performing below potential (31st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
54.5% Above average
Lighting 65.2
Reflection 92
Parallax 61.7
53% 73 fps
MRender 68.9
Gravity 71.7
Splatting 68.9
57% 69.8 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 54.5%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba DT01ACA050 500GB-$23
367GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MS1OA750
SusWrite @10s intervals: 119 132 115 129 128 130 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
74.3% Very good
Read 133
Write 134
Mixed 32
SusWrite 126
77% 106 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.3
95% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 74.3%
Great: 103%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 1TB
26GB free, PID b206
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 17 17 17 17 17 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
12.8% Very poor
Read 28.3
Write 25.8
Mixed 18.7
SusWrite 17.1
29% 22.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.6
76% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 12.8%
Great: 45%
Seagate Expansion 1.5TB
33GB free, PID 231a
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 17 17 17 17 17 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
18.2% Very poor
Read 21
Write 21.7
Mixed 22
SusWrite 16.5
28% 20.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 3.7
4K Mixed 0.4
142% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 18.2%
Great: 53%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown TEAMGROUP-UD3-1600 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1067 MHz
Performing below potential (13th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
41.3% Average
MC Read 14.1
MC Write 14.3
MC Mixed 13.5
40% 14 GB/s
SC Read 12
SC Write 14
SC Mixed 13.3
37% 13.1 GB/s
Latency 82.7
48% 82.7 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 41.3%
Great: 60%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H61M-VG4 Builds (Compare 446 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock H61M-VG4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 92% - Outstanding Total price: $143
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $226Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback