Today's hottest deals

Monster TULPAR T5 V17.1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics5.19% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive57.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 99% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
SystemMonster TULPAR T5 V17.1  (all builds)
MotherboardStandard Standard
Memory6.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190222
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateAug 15 '21 at 22:28
Run Duration255 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU 14%
CPU Throttled 99%

 PC Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
86.8% Excellent
Memory 86.1
1-Core 120
2-Core 249
84% 152 Pts
4-Core 476
8-Core 654
71% 565 Pts
64-Core 783
48% 783 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 86.8%
Great: 86%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630
Device(1D05 1045) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.9415
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
5.19% Terrible
Lighting 6.7
Reflection 72.5
Parallax 7.8
6% 29 fps
MRender 10.2
Gravity 9
Splatting 0.3
5% 6.5 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 5.19%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel SSDSCKKW360H6 360GB
117GB free (System drive)
Firmware: LSF036C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 117 87 87 89 108 122 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
57.3% Above average
Read 397
Write 132
Mixed 168
SusWrite 102
44% 200 MB/s
4K Read 18.4
4K Write 62.1
4K Mixed 21.8
89% 34.1 MB/s
DQ Read 279
DQ Write 91.4
DQ Mixed 115
103% 162 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 57.3%
Great: 92%
Seagate ST1000LM035-1RK172 1TB
770GB free
Firmware: LCM2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 124 125 126 124 120 129 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
67.4% Good
Read 111
Write 101
Mixed 64.2
SusWrite 125
73% 100 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.4
99% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 67.4%
Great: 71%
Seagate Expansion 1TB
635GB free
Firmware: 0710
SusWrite @10s intervals: 117 118 118 121 119 123 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
58.8% Above average
Read 85.9
Write 120
Mixed 85.8
SusWrite 119
76% 103 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 0.9
139% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 58.8%
Great: 66%
Lexar USB Flash Drive 32GB
25GB free, PID 0cd1
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 35 25 26 26 26 27 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
30.5% Below average
Read 126
Write 24.1
Mixed 54
SusWrite 27.7
63% 58 MB/s
4K Read 7.7
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 3.3
188% 4.13 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 30.5%
Great: 93%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown F4-2400C16-8GRS Samsung M471A1K43CB1-CRC 16GB
2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
72.4% Very good
MC Read 28.7
MC Write 27.2
MC Mixed 20.5
73% 25.5 GB/s
SC Read 16.3
SC Write 27.3
SC Mixed 24.2
65% 22.6 GB/s
Latency 71.1
56% 71.1 ns
Poor: 58%
This bench: 72.4%
Great: 78%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 42: 6R 3G 3B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
42% 20% 60 219 123 60 15.5" 1536 864 AUO61ED
History: Score 21: 4R 0G 1B | Score 42: 6R 3G 3B
Typical TULPAR T5 V17.1 Builds (Compare 190 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 38%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 33%
Sail boat

System: Monster TULPAR T5 V17.1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 31% - Below average Total price: $40
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $226Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback