Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-H310M H 2.0

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (74th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 26 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 90.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics0.5% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-H310M H 2.0  (all builds)
Memory6.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores, 1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190813
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateAug 14 '21 at 20:50
Run Duration139 Seconds
Run User COL-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing above expectations (74th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-9100F-$115
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
90.6% Outstanding
Memory 91.8
1-Core 112
2-Core 259
85% 154 Pts
4-Core 516
8-Core 514
69% 515 Pts
64-Core 524
32% 524 Pts
Poor: 72%
This bench: 90.6%
Great: 86%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro NVS 450
Nvidia(10DE 0619) 256MB
Ram: 256MB, Driver: 342.01
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
0.5% Terrible
Lighting 0.4
Reflection 2
Parallax 0.2
0% 0.87 fps
MRender 2.2
Gravity 0.5
Splatting 0.6
1% 1.1 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.5%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hitachi HUA723020ALA640 2TB-$41
1TB free (System drive)
Firmware: MK7ONS01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 106 105 112 119 113 119 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
75.8% Very good
Read 152
Write 118
Mixed 77.8
SusWrite 112
84% 115 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.8
168% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 75.8%
Great: 83%
Samsung HM251JI 250GB
233GB free
Firmware: 2SS00_01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 66 67 67 68 67 67 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
38.4% Below average
Read 66.8
Write 64.8
Mixed 39.6
SusWrite 67
44% 59.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.5
97% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 38.4%
Great: 33%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX 2666 C16 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (39th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
42.2% Average
MC Read 15.8
MC Write 14.8
MC Mixed 11
40% 13.9 GB/s
SC Read 12.7
SC Write 14.9
SC Mixed 12.1
38% 13.2 GB/s
Latency 64.4
62% 64.4 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 42.2%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-H310M H 2.0 Builds (Compare 3,928 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 32%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H310M H 2.0

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 101% - Outstanding Total price: $238
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i7-14700K $355Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback