PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 23.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 43.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 16GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | HP Z200 Workstation (all builds) |
Motherboard | Hewlett-Packard 0B40h |
Memory | 13.6 GB free of 16.0039 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20160211 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Aug 14 '21 at 18:06 |
Run Duration | 189 Seconds |
Run User | USA-User |
Background CPU | 9% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i7 870-$100
XU1 PROCESSOR, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.05 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg)
|
66.3%
Good
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 950-$100
Asus(1043 8581) 2GB
CLim: 1392 MHz, MLim: 1652 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 466.47
Performing below potential (16th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
23.2%
Poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
PNY CS1311 240GB-$78
126GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CS131122
SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 25 25 96 147 129 MB/s
|
43.3%
Average
|
|||
Crucial P2 3D NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$99
533GB free
Firmware: P2CR031 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 547 361 497 470 433 457 MB/s
|
125%
Outstanding
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware
Score | Hit Rate | Shots | EFps | 0.1% Low | Refresh Rate | Screen | Resolution | Monitor |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
9% | 43% | 7 | 99 | 6 | 60 | 32.1" | 1920 1080 | WDE5960 TX-42F810G |
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i7 870Intel $100Bench 66%, 37,228 samples | 59x |
Core i5 650Intel $70Bench 46%, 42,063 samples | 37x |
Xeon X3450IntelBench 66%, 3,425 samples | 30x |
GPU | |
---|---|
HD Graphics (Clarkdale 0.733/0.9 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 20,588 samples | 19x |
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 17x |
Quadro 2000NvidiaBench 6%, 15,855 samples | 17x |
SSD | |
---|---|
860 Evo 250GBSamsung $52Bench 104%, 296,814 samples | 11x |
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples | 11x |
A400 240GBKingston $25Bench 66%, 424,288 samples | 7x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 65% - Good | Total price: $152 |