Today's hottest deals

bin bin

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics5.33% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive188% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
System
MotherboardIntel NUC6i5SYB
Memory14 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20171115
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateAug 11 '21 at 22:59
Run Duration125 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6260U
CPU1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
56.4% Above average
Memory 74.5
1-Core 90
2-Core 142
61% 102 Pts
4-Core 224
8-Core 222
30% 223 Pts
64-Core 228
14% 228 Pts
Poor: 40%
This bench: 56.4%
Great: 64%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Graphics 540
Intel(8086 2063) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8682
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
5.33% Terrible
Lighting 9.9
Reflection 8.5
Parallax 11.3
8% 9.9 fps
Poor: 5%
This bench: 5.33%
Great: 9%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 950 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB-$150
191GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B0QBXX7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 764 814 784 782 772 760 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
188% Outstanding
Read 1,388
Write 874
Mixed 602
SusWrite 779
203% 911 MB/s
4K Read 46.7
4K Write 119
4K Mixed 50.7
199% 72.1 MB/s
DQ Read 787
DQ Write 318
DQ Mixed 380
327% 495 MB/s
Poor: 131%
This bench: 188%
Great: 243%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 2133 C15 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
89.1% Excellent
MC Read 29.1
MC Write 47.6
MC Mixed 23.7
96% 33.5 GB/s
SC Read 14.9
SC Write 29.7
SC Mixed 20.9
62% 21.8 GB/s
Latency 91.5
44% 91.5 ns
Poor: 55%
This bench: 89.1%
Great: 89%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 9 7 60 24" 1280 720 ACR00DC ACER V243H
Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,915 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $322
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $230Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback