Today's hottest deals

Asus TUF GAMING B550M-PLUS (WI-FI)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 104%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 96%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics122% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive121% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (26%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING B550M-PLUS (WI-FI)  (all builds)
Memory9.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210621
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 07 '21 at 21:47
Run Duration194 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 26%

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3600-$88
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
83.9% Excellent
Memory 81.4
1-Core 143
2-Core 270
90% 165 Pts
4-Core 464
8-Core 763
75% 614 Pts
64-Core 946
59% 946 Pts
Poor: 73%
This bench: 83.9%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 6700-XT-$480
AMD(1002 0E36) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 12GB, Driver: 21.7.2
Performing below potential (54th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
122% Outstanding
Lighting 144
Reflection 134
Parallax 286
118% 188 fps
MRender 224
Gravity 142
Splatting 170
144% 178 fps
Poor: 113%
This bench: 122%
Great: 129%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 870 EVO 1TB-$100
634GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 458 468 448 466 453 466 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
121% Outstanding
Read 510
Write 422
Mixed 358
SusWrite 460
98% 437 MB/s
4K Read 35.4
4K Write 118
4K Mixed 50.3
181% 67.9 MB/s
DQ Read 385
DQ Write 360
DQ Mixed 304
247% 350 MB/s
Poor: 82%
This bench: 121%
Great: 137%
Sandisk PLUS 480GB
171GB free
Firmware: UG4500RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 266 100 103 103 190 182 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
57.9% Above average
Read 459
Write 368
Mixed 254
SusWrite 157
69% 310 MB/s
4K Read 23
4K Write 45.7
4K Mixed 19.5
84% 29.4 MB/s
DQ Read 117
DQ Write 87.6
DQ Mixed 25.4
40% 76.8 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 57.9%
Great: 61%
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$100
36GB free
Firmware: EXT0DB6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 341 84 79 75 78 74 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
105% Outstanding
Read 502
Write 452
Mixed 417
SusWrite 122
83% 373 MB/s
4K Read 44.7
4K Write 108
4K Mixed 55.7
196% 69.3 MB/s
DQ Read 383
DQ Write 360
DQ Mixed 231
212% 325 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 105%
Great: 118%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$47
1TB free
Firmware: CC27
SusWrite @10s intervals: 86 87 89 89 91 87 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
28.8% Poor
Read 11.9
Write 102
Mixed 77.5
SusWrite 88.2
52% 69.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.4
100% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 28.8%
Great: 114%
SanDisk Cruzer Edge 16GB
3GB free, PID 556b
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.4 1.8 4.1 4.2 4.2 4.1 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
6.25% Terrible
Read 21.9
Write 14.2
Mixed 16.2
SusWrite 3.5
17% 13.9 MB/s
4K Read 4.6
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 1.5
82% 2.17 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 6.25%
Great: 13%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
KLEVV KD48GU880-32A160U 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
89.5% Excellent
MC Read 37.1
MC Write 24
MC Mixed 35.3
92% 32.1 GB/s
SC Read 26.3
SC Write 22
SC Mixed 34.9
79% 27.7 GB/s
Latency 78
51% 78 ns
Poor: 68%
This bench: 89.5%
Great: 112%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 10 7 144 27" 1280 720 ACR0628 ED273 A
Typical TUF GAMING B550M-PLUS (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 4,642 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 142%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING B550M-PLUS (WI-FI)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 93% - Outstanding Total price: $739
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i7-14700K $333Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback