Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-B75M-D3H

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 27%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics29.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive35.8% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-B75M-D3H  (all builds)
Memory29 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20131023
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 07 '21 at 12:30
Run Duration228 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3570K-$93
Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-3570K CPU @ 3.40GHz, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
75% Very good
Memory 83.2
1-Core 105
2-Core 207
75% 132 Pts
4-Core 386
8-Core 388
52% 387 Pts
64-Core 399
25% 399 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 75%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 471.11
Performing below potential (59th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
29.3% Poor
Lighting 37.1
Reflection 41.2
Parallax 38.3
30% 38.9 fps
MRender 37.4
Gravity 38.4
Splatting 27.5
28% 34.4 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 29.3%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
V-gen12sm20ar128sdk 128GB 128GB
42GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S0413A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 42 41 52 57 54 51 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
35.8% Below average
Read 362
Write 135
Mixed 58
SusWrite 49.5
33% 151 MB/s
4K Read 23.2
4K Write 38.3
4K Mixed 3.6
60% 21.7 MB/s
DQ Read 29.2
DQ Write 53
DQ Mixed 1.3
12% 27.8 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 35.8%
Great: 86%
Adata SU650 120GB-$14
39GB free
Firmware: V8X02c08
SusWrite @10s intervals: 59 75 73 76 77 77 MB/s
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
35.8% Below average
Read 131
Write 160
Mixed 138
SusWrite 72.9
28% 126 MB/s
4K Read 20.2
4K Write 31.8
4K Mixed 23.8
78% 25.3 MB/s
DQ Read 22.5
DQ Write 52.8
DQ Mixed 30.1
25% 35.1 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 35.8%
Great: 88%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$22
120GB free
Firmware: 19.01H19
SusWrite @10s intervals: 59 75 73 76 77 77 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
42.4% Average
Read 74.7
Write 73
Mixed 53.5
SusWrite 72.8
50% 68.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.7
130% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 42.4%
Great: 69%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B5273EBO-CKO 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
59.6% Above average
MC Read 21.5
MC Write 22.2
MC Mixed 18.4
59% 20.7 GB/s
SC Read 17.7
SC Write 18.7
SC Mixed 19.9
54% 18.8 GB/s
Latency 74.9
53% 74.9 ns
Poor: 43%
This bench: 59.6%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 52: 8R 4G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
52% 44% 27 338 273 60 23" 1366 768 DEL409A DELL P2314H
History: Score 56: 9R 3G 2B | Score 52: 8R 4G 0B
Typical GA-B75M-D3H Builds (Compare 3,960 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-B75M-D3H - $80

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $402
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $390WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $215Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback