Today's hottest deals

Asrock H61M-GS

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 43%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 48.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics1.07% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock H61M-GS  (all builds)
Memory0.6 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120516
Uptime20.9 Days
Run DateAug 02 '21 at 10:54
Run Duration364 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing below expectations (30th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium G860-$73
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
48.6% Average
Memory 80.2
1-Core 52.6
2-Core 79.5
48% 70.8 Pts
4-Core 103
8-Core 95.3
14% 99.2 Pts
64-Core 91.8
6% 91.8 Pts
Poor: 39%
This bench: 48.6%
Great: 59%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 5450
PwrHis(1787 2291) 2GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
1.07% Terrible
Lighting 1.2
Reflection 2
Parallax 1.6
1% 1.6 fps
MRender 1.9
Gravity 0.5
Splatting 2
1% 1.47 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.07%
Great: 1%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$47
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: CC25
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.4 5.9 4.7 5.1 9.8 6.8 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile)
3.6% Terrible
Read 6.2
Write 3
Mixed 7.2
SusWrite 6.4
4% 5.7 MB/s
4K Read 0
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
0% 0 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 3.6%
Great: 114%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair ValueSelect DDR3 1333 C9 1x4GB-$21
1 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1067 MHz
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
17.8% Very poor
MC Read 6
MC Write 5.5
MC Mixed 4.5
15% 5.33 GB/s
SC Read 4.2
SC Write 4.6
SC Mixed 4.2
12% 4.33 GB/s
Latency 80.2
50% 80.2 ns
Poor: 18%
This bench: 17.8%
Great: 30%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 21: 3R 1G 3B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
21% 5% 139 20 16 60 0" 1440 900 Default
History: Score 7: 0R 2G 1B | Score 21: 3R 1G 3B
Typical H61M-GS Builds (Compare 172 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock H61M-GS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 53% - Above average Total price: $239
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $239Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback