Today's hottest deals

MSI MS-16JB

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics35.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (36%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMicro-Star GP62MVR 6RF
MotherboardMSI MS-16JB  (all builds)
Memory0.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180116
Uptime4.9 Days
Run DateAug 01 '21 at 11:51
Run Duration179 Seconds
Run User ROU-User
Background CPU 36%

 PC Performing below expectations (27th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.05 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
63.6% Good
Memory 71.6
1-Core 78
2-Core 163
60% 104 Pts
4-Core 300
8-Core 469
47% 384 Pts
64-Core 468
29% 468 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 63.6%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060 (Mobile)
MSI(1462 11D5) 3GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 27.21.14.6172
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
35.9% Below average
Lighting 42.4
Reflection 53.3
Parallax 43.2
35% 46.3 fps
MRender 51
Gravity 40.9
Splatting 48.6
38% 46.8 fps
Poor: 35%
This bench: 35.9%
Great: 52%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba THNSNJ128G8NY 128GB
17GB free (System drive)
Firmware: JYXA0101
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 369
Write 364
Mixed 339
80% 357 MB/s
4K Read 5.5
4K Write 67.4
4K Mixed 30.7
83% 34.5 MB/s
DQ Read 295
DQ Write 279
DQ Mixed 290
217% 288 MB/s
Poor: 49% Great: 94%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston MSI24D4S7S8MB-8 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
29.1% Poor
MC Read 11.4
MC Write 9.7
MC Mixed 9
29% 10 GB/s
SC Read 6.9
SC Write 7
SC Mixed 7.5
20% 7.13 GB/s
Latency 97.7
41% 97.7 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 29.1%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 48: 6R 6G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
48% 19% 62 187 101 60 15.5" 1536 864 CMN15D2
History: Score 26: 3R 2G 5B | Score 48: 6R 6G 0B
Typical MS-16JB Builds (Compare 1,761 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 35%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft

Motherboard: MSI MS-16JB

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $390WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $215Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback