Today's hottest deals

Acer Veriton M6670G

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 108%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 106%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 116%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 104%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics102% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive282% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemAcer Veriton M6670G  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Veriton M6670G
Memory26.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210401
Uptime1.1 Days
Run DateJul 31 '21 at 15:02
Run Duration316 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU5%
Watch Gameplay: 2060S + 10600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-10900-$450
U3E1, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 4.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
104% Outstanding
Memory 93.7
1-Core 158
2-Core 314
103% 189 Pts
4-Core 614
8-Core 1,184
107% 899 Pts
64-Core 1,970
122% 1,970 Pts
Poor: 75%
This bench: 104%
Great: 102%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060S (Super)-$270
Sapphire(174B A520) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 471.41
Performing below potential (73rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
102% Outstanding
Lighting 124
Reflection 112
Parallax 127
101% 121 fps
MRender 179
Gravity 112
Splatting 103
104% 131 fps
Poor: 90%
This bench: 102%
Great: 106%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC PC SN730 SDBQNTY-1T00-1014 1TB
882GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 11101100
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1869 1717 1720 1728 1725 1728 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
282% Outstanding
Read 1,790
Write 1,993
Mixed 1,814
SusWrite 1,748
415% 1,836 MB/s
4K Read 40.7
4K Write 115
4K Mixed 60.1
200% 72 MB/s
DQ Read 1,023
DQ Write 856
DQ Mixed 941
704% 940 MB/s
Poor: 153%
This bench: 282%
Great: 299%
Seagate ST4000VN008-2DR166 2TB
2TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 204 213 211 215 216 216 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Read 198
Write 190
Mixed 87.7
SusWrite 212
125% 172 MB/s
4K Read 13
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 1.1
688% 5.13 MB/s
Seagate IronWolf 4TB (2016)-$82
2TB free
Firmware: SC60
SusWrite @10s intervals: 117 110 114 119 114 113 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
85.9% Excellent
Read 185
Write 154
Mixed 81
SusWrite 114
98% 134 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.8
151% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 62%
This bench: 85.9%
Great: 108%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 3TB-$84
435GB free
Firmware: CC4H
SusWrite @10s intervals: 111 119 122 119 120 119 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
72% Very good
Read 133
Write 116
Mixed 81.8
SusWrite 118
83% 112 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.7
127% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 72%
Great: 113%
WD Green 3TB (2011)-$59
498GB free
Firmware: 80.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 86 87 89 89 89 89 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
49% Average
Read 82.1
Write 80
Mixed 70.2
SusWrite 88.2
59% 80.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.9
171% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 49%
Great: 83%
Seagate IronWolf 4TB (2016)-$82
1TB free
Firmware: SC60
SusWrite @10s intervals: 112 109 110 106 112 116 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
69.6% Good
Read 132
Write 113
Mixed 76
SusWrite 111
79% 108 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.8
151% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 62%
This bench: 69.6%
Great: 108%
ST3000DM 001-1CH166 3TB
658GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 53 54 54 55 55 55 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
34.5% Below average
Read 132
Write 111
Mixed 83.3
SusWrite 54.3
122% 95.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.7
64% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 34.5%
Great: 71%
ST320006 44NS 2TB
867GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 106 107 109 109 110 109 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
44.5% Average
Read 96
Write 117
Mixed 66.7
SusWrite 108
134% 97.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 1.1
115% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 44.5%
Great: 45%
Hitachi HDS5C3030ALA630 3TB
738GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 52 54 54 55 55 55 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
27.6% Poor
Read 73.8
Write 79.6
Mixed 42.3
SusWrite 54.1
83% 62.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.6
77% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 27.6%
Great: 42%
Hitachi HUA723030ALA641 3TB
2TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 135 135 135 135 135 135 MB/s
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
54.3% Above average
Read 127
Write 131
Mixed 73.7
SusWrite 135
158% 117 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.8
98% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 54.3%
Great: 54%
WD Elements 25A3 12TB
7TB free, PID 25a3
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 186 186 189 185 189 190 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
80.7% Excellent
Read 187
Write 187
Mixed 173
SusWrite 188
251% 183 MB/s
4K Read 9.5
4K Write 3.4
4K Mixed 3.4
266% 5.43 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 80.7%
Great: 100%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston ACR32D4U2S8ME-16 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 2933 MHz
Performing below potential (11th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
77.4% Very good
MC Read 28.4
MC Write 28.7
MC Mixed 21.1
74% 26.1 GB/s
SC Read 18.9
SC Write 39.8
SC Mixed 27.3
82% 28.7 GB/s
Latency 60.4
66% 60.4 ns
Poor: 74%
This bench: 77.4%
Great: 99%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 8 6 60 27" 1280 720 SAM082E SMS27A650
Typical Veriton M6670G Builds (Compare 13 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 92%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 90%
Aircraft carrier

System: Acer Veriton M6670G

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 89% - Excellent Total price: $565
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $78
Intel Core i5-13600K $215Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback