Today's hottest deals

Asus PRIME A320M-C R2.0

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 39%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (20th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 80 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 29.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics61.4% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (74%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
MotherboardAsus PRIME A320M-C R2.0  (all builds)
Memory2.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colors, 1280 x 720 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191014
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJul 23 '21 at 22:32
Run Duration319 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 74%
Watch Gameplay: 1660 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD PRO A10-9700 R7, 10 COMPUTE CORES 4C+6G
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
29.6% Poor
Memory 41.2
1-Core 23.7
2-Core 86.2
29% 50.4 Pts
4-Core 104
8-Core 113
14% 109 Pts
64-Core 116
7% 116 Pts
Poor: 30%
This bench: 29.6%
Great: 53%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-$209
Asus(1043 86EA) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 2100 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 466.47
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
61.4% Good
Lighting 78.3
Reflection 95.4
Parallax 60
64% 77.9 fps
MRender 65.7
Gravity 72.5
Splatting 69.5
57% 69.2 fps
Poor: 62%
This bench: 61.4%
Great: 73%
AMD Radeon R7 Graphics
Asus(1043 8719) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 20.10.20
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
7.12% Terrible
Lighting 8.9
Reflection 9.2
Parallax 13.2
7% 10.4 fps
MRender 5.9
Gravity 9.7
Splatting 9.1
7% 8.23 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 7.12%
Great: 8%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba P300 1TB-$32
581GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MS2OA8R0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 79 83 103 95 95 63 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
26.1% Poor
Read 4.7
Write 126
Mixed 11.1
SusWrite 86.2
41% 57 MB/s
4K Read 0
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.1
28% 0.33 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 26.1%
Great: 107%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
18.2% Very poor
MC Read 7.9
MC Write 4.5
MC Mixed 7.7
19% 6.7 GB/s
SC Read 3.5
SC Write 2.1
SC Mixed 4.5
10% 3.37 GB/s
Latency 197
20% 197 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 18.2%
Great: 88%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 45: 5R 5G 5B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
45% 8% 184 154 18 60 18.9" 1440 900 HWP26A2 HP w1907
History: Score 42: 5R 4G 5B | Score 70: 10R 5G 5B | Score 45: 5R 5G 5B
Typical PRIME A320M-C R2.0 Builds (Compare 276 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus PRIME A320M-C R2.0

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 92% - Outstanding Total price: $144
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $140
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $218Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback