Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-AX370M-Gaming 3-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 33%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (76th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 24 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics33.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemGigabyte AX370M-Gaming 3
MotherboardGigabyte GA-AX370M-Gaming 3-CF  (all builds)
Memory12.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben, 1024 x 768 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180131
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 23 '21 at 10:02
Run Duration164 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (76th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 2600-$120
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
79.7% Very good
Memory 75
1-Core 120
2-Core 238
79% 144 Pts
4-Core 454
8-Core 710
72% 582 Pts
64-Core 908
56% 908 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 79.7%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960-$198
Gigabyte(1458 36D2) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1430 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 471.11
Performing below potential (65th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
33.3% Below average
Lighting 42.4
Reflection 45.5
Parallax 40.8
35% 42.9 fps
MRender 37.2
Gravity 40.6
Splatting 35.6
31% 37.8 fps
Poor: 30%
This bench: 33.3%
Great: 36%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intenso Sata III 256GB
13GB free (System drive)
Firmware: R0817B0
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 500
Write 405
Mixed 58.7
70% 321 MB/s
4K Read 21.7
4K Write 13.2
4K Mixed 1.4
42% 12.1 MB/s
DQ Read 125
DQ Write 20.5
DQ Mixed 2.1
20% 49.1 MB/s
Poor: 39% Great: 95%
Intenso SATA III SSD 240GB
59GB free
Firmware: SBFM81.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 292 297 299 298 301 301 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
95.6% Outstanding
Read 428
Write 270
Mixed 293
SusWrite 298
72% 322 MB/s
4K Read 35.6
4K Write 89.3
4K Mixed 39.6
152% 54.8 MB/s
DQ Read 311
DQ Write 310
DQ Mixed 217
189% 279 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 95.6%
Great: 96%
TOSHIBA-TR200 240GB
58GB free
Firmware: SBFA12.6
SusWrite @10s intervals: 349 100 100 100 100 102 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
84.9% Excellent
Read 478
Write 271
Mixed 326
SusWrite 142
68% 304 MB/s
4K Read 35.3
4K Write 84.1
4K Mixed 36.9
145% 52.1 MB/s
DQ Read 267
DQ Write 309
DQ Mixed 194
172% 257 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 84.9%
Great: 90%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance RGB DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB-$171
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
78.2% Very good
MC Read 30.3
MC Write 27.5
MC Mixed 26.3
80% 28 GB/s
SC Read 21.1
SC Write 28.5
SC Mixed 24
70% 24.5 GB/s
Latency 90.3
44% 90.3 ns
Poor: 54%
This bench: 78.2%
Great: 104%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 9 6 60 23.8" 1280 720 ACR035B G246HYL
Typical GA-AX370M-Gaming 3-CF Builds (Compare 182 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 47%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 43%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-AX370M-Gaming 3-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 100% - Outstanding Total price: $322
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $230Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback