PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (26th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 74 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
Graphics | 21.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 98.1% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
Memory | 32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Asus PRIME Z390-A (all builds) |
Memory | 25.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20200604 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Jul 22 '21 at 22:37 |
Run Duration | 199 Seconds |
Run User | USA-User |
Background CPU | 30% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i9-9900K-$380
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
|
79.3%
Very good
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia RTX 2080-Ti-$441
CLim: 2280 MHz, MLim: 3600 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 471.41
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
21.1%
Poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
187GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 331 342 337 328 325 314 MB/s
|
98.1%
Outstanding
|
|||
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$140
311GB free
Firmware: RVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 409 465 478 480 466 474 MB/s
|
117%
Outstanding
|
|||
SanDisk SSD Plus 240GB-$30
104GB free
Firmware: Z32080RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 131 74 76 54 87 64 MB/s
|
42.7%
Average
|
|||
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37
337GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 114 119 121 120 119 120 MB/s
|
76.5%
Very good
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Adata DDR4 3000 2OZ 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
|
68.8%
Good
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware
Score | Hit Rate | Shots | EFps | 0.1% Low | Refresh Rate | Screen | Resolution | Monitor |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
26% | 19% | 52 | 141 | 71 | 180 | 24" | 1920 1080 | ACR050E Acer XB241H |
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i7-9700KIntel $235Bench 97%, 550,833 samples | 9,656x |
Core i9-9900KIntel $380Bench 98%, 354,223 samples | 6,512x |
Core i5-9600KIntel $126Bench 93%, 321,194 samples | 4,330x |
GPU | |
---|---|
RTX 3070Nvidia $470Bench 148%, 619,642 samples | 2,054x |
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia $275Bench 115%, 663,603 samples | 1,987x |
RTX 3080Nvidia $747Bench 187%, 424,051 samples | 1,680x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 91% - Outstanding | Total price: $1,052 |