Today's hottest deals

Lenovo 20193

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics6.38% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive86.1% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemLenovo 20193  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO INVALID
Memory9.5 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121129
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 22 '21 at 00:23
Run Duration133 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3630QM-$420
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
66.9% Good
Memory 85.2
1-Core 91.4
2-Core 177
69% 118 Pts
4-Core 306
8-Core 167
35% 237 Pts
64-Core 168
10% 168 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 66.9%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 650M
Legend(17AA 3972) 2GB
CLim: 789 MHz, MLim: 1000 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 376.54
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
6.38% Terrible
Lighting 7.2
Reflection 8.9
Parallax 9.1
6% 8.4 fps
MRender 10.3
Gravity 9.1
Splatting 8.1
7% 9.17 fps
Poor: 5%
This bench: 6.38%
Great: 7%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$100
198GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0DB6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 332 277 276 275 276 275 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
86.1% Excellent
Read 455
Write 425
Mixed 344
SusWrite 285
85% 377 MB/s
4K Read 29.5
4K Write 42.3
4K Mixed 33.5
110% 35.1 MB/s
DQ Read 385
DQ Write 345
DQ Mixed 222
206% 317 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 86.1%
Great: 118%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5273DH0-CK0 Kingston KHX1600C9S3L/8G 12GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (17th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
32.5% Below average
MC Read 11.4
MC Write 9.8
MC Mixed 9.4
29% 10.2 GB/s
SC Read 11.2
SC Write 11.8
SC Mixed 10.8
32% 11.3 GB/s
Latency 71.8
56% 71.8 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 32.5%
Great: 46%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 9 7 60 21.5" 1280 720 DELF071 DELL SE2216H
Typical 20193 Builds (Compare 248 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 20193

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 52% - Above average Total price: $520
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $226Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback