Today's hottest deals

HP Envy All-in-One 32-a1055 Rfrbd PC

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 92.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics5.89% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemHP Envy All-in-One 32-a1055 Rfrbd PC  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 86C7
Memory9.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210205
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 20 '21 at 19:46
Run Duration226 Seconds
Run User LBN-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-10700-$295
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
92.3% Outstanding
Memory 89.2
1-Core 134
2-Core 269
91% 164 Pts
4-Core 512
8-Core 983
89% 747 Pts
64-Core 1,384
86% 1,384 Pts
Poor: 75%
This bench: 92.3%
Great: 100%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630
HP(103C 86C7) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8984
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
5.89% Terrible
Lighting 5.7
Reflection 101
Parallax 8.6
5% 38.3 fps
MRender 10.8
Gravity 7.4
Splatting 11.7
8% 9.97 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 5.89%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel Optane+477G 512GB
384GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 17.9
SusWrite @10s intervals: 514 510 503 502 505 502 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 35% Great: 94%
WD WD10SPSX-60A6WT0 1TB
906GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 138 143 145 145 145 146 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 43% Great: 83%
Seagate BUP Slim BK 1TB
19GB free
Firmware: 0108
SusWrite @10s intervals: 64 65 63 61 62 63 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
33.6% Below average
Read 53.1
Write 57.9
Mixed 97.3
SusWrite 63.1
51% 67.8 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.9
4K Mixed 0.5
155% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 33.6%
Great: 63%
TOSHIBA MK3259GSX 320GB
210GB free, PID 70f1
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 14 14 14 14 18 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
8.8% Terrible
Read 29
Write 15.7
Mixed 18.4
SusWrite 14.9
24% 19.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.1
19% 0.33 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 8.8%
Great: 19%
SAMSUNG HM500JI 500GB
111GB free, PID 70f1
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 14 14 14 14 15 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
12.6% Very poor
Read 30.8
Write 28.5
Mixed 30.8
SusWrite 14.5
35% 26.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
80% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 12.6%
Great: 20%
Samsung G2 Portable 500GB
34GB free, PID 6033
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 14 14 14 14 14 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
12.5% Very poor
Read 33.5
Write 22.1
Mixed 27.6
SusWrite 14.7
31% 24.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.7
73% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 12.5%
Great: 21%
WD Elements 2TB
859GB free, PID 10b8
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 72 73 74 72 73 72 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
33.4% Below average
Read 82.2
Write 83.7
Mixed 50.6
SusWrite 72.6
97% 72.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.7
87% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 33.4%
Great: 44%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 4ATF1G64HZ-3G2E1 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 2933 MHz
Performing below potential (22nd percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
62.8% Good
MC Read 23.2
MC Write 22.1
MC Mixed 16.8
59% 20.7 GB/s
SC Read 17.7
SC Write 34.8
SC Mixed 21.3
70% 24.6 GB/s
Latency 68.2
59% 68.2 ns
Poor: 57%
This bench: 62.8%
Great: 84%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Envy All-in-One 32-a1055 Rfrbd PC Builds (Compare 2 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Tree trunk

System: HP Envy All-in-One 32-a1055 Rfrbd PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 103% - Outstanding Total price: $642
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $215Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback