Today's hottest deals

Microelectronics G164

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 49%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 46%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics53% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive210% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemMicroelectronics G164  (all builds)
MotherboardASRock B450M/ac
Memory11.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191120
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 18 '21 at 07:13
Run Duration189 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3600-$89
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
83.6% Excellent
Memory 72.1
1-Core 146
2-Core 284
89% 167 Pts
4-Core 511
8-Core 806
81% 658 Pts
64-Core 993
62% 993 Pts
Poor: 73%
This bench: 83.6%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 5500-XT-$217
PowerColor(148C 2401) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 8GB, Driver: 21.7.1
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
53% Above average
Lighting 70.1
Reflection 67.7
Parallax 94.4
57% 77.4 fps
MRender 54.3
Gravity 72.9
Splatting 41.9
45% 56.4 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 53%
Great: 54%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue SN550 NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$70
98GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 211210WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 721 469 192 178 175 181 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
210% Outstanding
Read 1,523
Write 1,605
Mixed 1,195
SusWrite 319
260% 1,161 MB/s
4K Read 50.5
4K Write 182
4K Mixed 71.9
265% 101 MB/s
DQ Read 1,195
DQ Write 983
DQ Mixed 973
760% 1,050 MB/s
Poor: 152%
This bench: 210%
Great: 237%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown NMUD480E85-2666E 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
68.9% Good
MC Read 27.8
MC Write 19.2
MC Mixed 27.5
71% 24.8 GB/s
SC Read 19.8
SC Write 17.8
SC Mixed 24.3
59% 20.6 GB/s
Latency 96.5
41% 96.5 ns
Poor: 69%
This bench: 68.9%
Great: 82%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 62: 9R 3G 8B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
62% 15% 131 317 249 144 23.8" 1920 1080 AUS24AF ASUS VP249
History: Score 39: 4R 4G 7B | Score 62: 9R 3G 8B
Typical G164 Builds (Compare 47 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 49%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 46%
Yacht

System: Microelectronics G164

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 70% - Good Total price: $376
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $215Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback