Today's hottest deals

HP All-in-One 22-c0xx

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 33%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 29.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics3.16% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemHP All-in-One 22-c0xx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8430
Memory8.7 GB free of 12 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200525
Uptime1.8 Days
Run DateJul 17 '21 at 22:16
Run Duration140 Seconds
Run User COL-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A9-9425 APU (2016 M.SR)
P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
29.1% Poor
Memory 40
1-Core 68.7
2-Core 109
41% 72.5 Pts
4-Core 107
8-Core 106
14% 106 Pts
64-Core 98.9
6% 98.9 Pts
Poor: 9%
This bench: 29.1%
Great: 39%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R5 Graphics
HP(103C 8430) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 17.12
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
3.16% Terrible
Lighting 3.6
Reflection 4.4
Parallax 5.3
3% 4.43 fps
MRender 2.8
Gravity 4.2
Splatting 5.6
4% 4.2 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.16%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata SU650NS38 240GB
161GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P191202a
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,164
Write 23.3
Mixed 44.7
86% 411 MB/s
4K Read 223
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 3.5
344% 76.3 MB/s
Poor: 43% Great: 107%
WD WD5000AZLX-00K4KA0 500GB
362GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 149 128 152 143 167 179 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
93.3% Outstanding
Read 172
Write 165
Mixed 86.6
SusWrite 153
106% 144 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1.1
200% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 93.3%
Great: 104%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 4ATF51264HZ-3G2J1 Adata 12GB
3200, 2666 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
20.1% Poor
MC Read 7.3
MC Write 6.7
MC Mixed 6.9
20% 6.97 GB/s
SC Read 5.2
SC Write 6.6
SC Mixed 6.6
18% 6.13 GB/s
Latency 202
20% 202 ns
Poor: 20%
This bench: 20.1%
Great: 76%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical All-in-One 22-c0xx Builds (Compare 467 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk

System: HP All-in-One 22-c0xx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $148
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i7-14700K $355Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback