Today's hottest deals

Asus TUF GAMING B450M-PLUS II

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 50%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 50%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (86th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 14 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics52.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive80.2% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING B450M-PLUS II  (all builds)
Memory13.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210616
Uptime0.6 Days
Run DateJul 17 '21 at 11:54
Run Duration243 Seconds
Run User PHL-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 1700-$125
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.65 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
81.2% Excellent
Memory 79.7
1-Core 113
2-Core 225
78% 139 Pts
4-Core 443
8-Core 829
76% 636 Pts
64-Core 1,244
77% 1,244 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 81.2%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130
CLim: 1350 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 21.6.2
Performing below potential (66th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
52.3% Above average
Lighting 66.6
Reflection 63.1
Parallax 91.5
54% 73.7 fps
MRender 64.6
Gravity 72
Splatting 46.1
48% 60.9 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 52.3%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Spcc Solid State Disk 128GB
26GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFM61.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 321 123 64 65 65 66 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
80.2% Excellent
Read 480
Write 364
Mixed 323
SusWrite 117
72% 321 MB/s
4K Read 35.3
4K Write 77.7
4K Mixed 32.6
136% 48.5 MB/s
DQ Read 240
DQ Write 326
DQ Mixed 187
168% 251 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 80.2%
Great: 93%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$35
820GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 198 200 198 198 200 184 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
113% Outstanding
Read 198
Write 90.3
Mixed 78.7
SusWrite 196
103% 141 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
158% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 113%
Great: 113%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Silicon-Power SP008GXLZU320BSA 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
111% Outstanding
MC Read 45.2
MC Write 42.1
MC Mixed 34.8
116% 40.7 GB/s
SC Read 27.1
SC Write 42.7
SC Mixed 31.4
96% 33.7 GB/s
Latency 81
49% 81 ns
Poor: 60%
This bench: 111%
Great: 111%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 61: 9R 3G 7B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
61% 46% 41 321 250 60 23.5" 1920 1080 AOC2470 2470W
History: Score 22: 2R 2G 6B | Score 61: 9R 3G 7B
Typical TUF GAMING B450M-PLUS II Builds (Compare 1,590 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 86%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 81%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING B450M-PLUS II

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $396
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $78
Intel Core i5-13600K $226Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback