Today's hottest deals

Asus A88X-PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 47%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 41.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics7.14% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive88% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus A88X-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160310
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 15 '21 at 21:27
Run Duration128 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A10-7700K APU (2014 D.Ka)
FM2+ , 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 4.1 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
41.9% Average
Memory 44.5
1-Core 73.5
2-Core 142
48% 86.6 Pts
4-Core 227
8-Core 222
30% 225 Pts
64-Core 232
14% 232 Pts
Poor: 35%
This bench: 41.9%
Great: 53%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R7 Graphics
Asus(1043 85CB) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 20.10.35.02
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
7.14% Terrible
Lighting 8.9
Reflection 9.5
Parallax 12.4
7% 10.3 fps
MRender 6.6
Gravity 9.3
Splatting 9.1
7% 8.33 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 7.14%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 120GB-$85
83GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0BB6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 272 136 140 140 142 144 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
88% Excellent
Read 473
Write 446
Mixed 335
SusWrite 162
79% 354 MB/s
4K Read 36.7
4K Write 78.5
4K Mixed 46.1
156% 53.8 MB/s
DQ Read 247
DQ Write 228
DQ Mixed 145
134% 206 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 88%
Great: 108%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 3TB-$84
3TB free
Firmware: CC25
SusWrite @10s intervals: 201 206 207 208 209 208 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
121% Outstanding
Read 215
Write 170
Mixed 93.2
SusWrite 206
125% 171 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.9
166% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 121%
Great: 113%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL RipjawsZ DDR3 1600 C9 4x2GB
4 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
37.9% Below average
MC Read 17.6
MC Write 8.9
MC Mixed 15.4
40% 14 GB/s
SC Read 9.1
SC Write 8.8
SC Mixed 12.1
29% 10 GB/s
Latency 182
22% 182 ns
Poor: 38%
This bench: 37.9%
Great: 64%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical A88X-PLUS Builds (Compare 124 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 47%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus A88X-PLUS - $95

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 45% - Average Total price: $265
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback