Today's hottest deals

Toshiba SATELLITE L755

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 53%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 53.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics1.79% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive48.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemToshiba SATELLITE L755  (all builds)
MotherboardIntel Base Board Product Name
Memory5.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20111230
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJul 12 '21 at 18:28
Run Duration197 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU 13%

 PC Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2450M-$225
CPU1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
53.6% Above average
Memory 75.1
1-Core 77.7
2-Core 122
56% 91.6 Pts
4-Core 187
8-Core 188
25% 188 Pts
64-Core 186
12% 186 Pts
Poor: 25%
This bench: 53.6%
Great: 59%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 520M
Toshiba(1179 FC50) 1GB
CLim: 740 MHz, MLim: 400 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 391.25
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
1.79% Terrible
Lighting 2.1
Reflection 4.1
Parallax 0.5
2% 2.23 fps
MRender 3
Gravity 2.2
Splatting 2.1
2% 2.43 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.79%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Netac 120GB 120GB
64GB free (System drive)
Firmware: FW200918
SusWrite @10s intervals: 63 36 51 57 42 84 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
48.4% Average
Read 443
Write 352
Mixed 330
SusWrite 55.3
66% 295 MB/s
4K Read 19.9
4K Write 41.6
4K Mixed 9.7
65% 23.7 MB/s
DQ Read 141
DQ Write 249
DQ Mixed 15.8
63% 135 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 48.4%
Great: 95%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CT51264BF160BJ.M8F Samsung M471B5273DH0-CH9 8GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
46.5% Average
MC Read 17
MC Write 16.7
MC Mixed 15
46% 16.2 GB/s
SC Read 13.9
SC Write 14.7
SC Mixed 13
40% 13.9 GB/s
Latency 90.1
44% 90.1 ns
Poor: 19%
This bench: 46.5%
Great: 47%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 16: 2R 1G 3B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
16% 4% 144 19 9 60 20" 1600 900 ACR022C Acer G205HV
History: Score 31: 3R 3G 7B | Score 16: 2R 1G 3B
Typical SATELLITE L755 Builds (Compare 515 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 47%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Toshiba SATELLITE L755

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 51% - Above average Total price: $185
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $226Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback