Today's hottest deals

HP All-in-One

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 23%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 22.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics1.6% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (53%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP All-in-One  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8381
Memory2.1 GB free of 4 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191216
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 12 '21 at 05:24
Run Duration232 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU 53%

 PC Performing below expectations (35th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD E2-9000 APU (2016 M.SR)
P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 1.75 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
22.7% Poor
Memory 38
1-Core 30
2-Core 39.6
24% 35.9 Pts
4-Core 44.7
8-Core 47.7
6% 46.2 Pts
64-Core 46.5
3% 46.5 Pts
Poor: 13%
This bench: 22.7%
Great: 39%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R2 Graphics
HP(103C 8381) 80MB
Ram: 80MB, Driver: 19.40.46.06
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
1.6% Terrible
Lighting 1.6
Reflection 3.5
Parallax 2.4
1% 2.5 fps
MRender 2
Gravity 1.7
Splatting 3.8
2% 2.5 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.6%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$30
896GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HPH5
SusWrite @10s intervals: 120 138 121 139 151 122 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
82.6% Excellent
Read 156
Write 180
Mixed 81.7
SusWrite 132
100% 137 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.7
133% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 82.6%
Great: 112%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata AO1P26KC4U1-BXOS 1x4GB
1 of 1 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR4 2666 MHz clocked @ 1866 MHz
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
17.4% Very poor
MC Read 6.3
MC Write 5.7
MC Mixed 6
17% 6 GB/s
SC Read 4.5
SC Write 5.2
SC Mixed 5.6
15% 5.1 GB/s
Latency 212
19% 212 ns
Poor: 17%
This bench: 17.4%
Great: 42%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 10: 1R 1G 2B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
10% 9% 47 14 9 60 19.5" 1920 1080 HWP425B HP ALL-in-One
History: Score 0: 0R 0G 0B | Score 10: 1R 1G 2B
Typical All-in-One Builds (Compare 310 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 24%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: HP All-in-One

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 23% - Poor Total price: $25
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $230Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback