Today's hottest deals

Asus ROG RAMPAGE VI EXTREME ENCORE

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 54%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 102%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 63%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 102%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics47% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive214% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
MotherboardAsus ROG RAMPAGE VI EXTREME ENCORE  (all builds)
Memory10.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210319
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 07 '21 at 15:31
Run Duration280 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing below expectations (34th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-10940X
LGA 2066 R4, 1 CPU, 14 cores, 28 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
102% Outstanding
Memory 90.5
1-Core 151
2-Core 304
99% 182 Pts
4-Core 604
8-Core 1,187
106% 895 Pts
64-Core 2,624
162% 2,624 Pts
Poor: 77%
This bench: 102%
Great: 96%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
Asus(1043 852E) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1430 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 466.11
Performing below potential (37th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
47% Average
Lighting 56.7
Reflection 69.7
Parallax 59.2
46% 61.9 fps
MRender 67.3
Gravity 58.5
Splatting 54.2
48% 60 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 47%
Great: 54%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Wd_black AN1500 1TB
857GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 10271043
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1947 1774 1729 1294 1856 2004 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
214% Outstanding
Read 877
Write 1,526
Mixed 1,010
SusWrite 1,767
295% 1,295 MB/s
4K Read 24.7
4K Write 89.5
4K Mixed 47.1
145% 53.8 MB/s
DQ Read 810
DQ Write 350
DQ Mixed 854
560% 671 MB/s
Poor: 164%
This bench: 214%
Great: 356%
Maxsun 240GB F7 240GB
223GB free
Firmware: S0509A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 301 54 46 36 55 55 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
48.3% Average
Read 450
Write 389
Mixed 29.6
SusWrite 91.4
53% 240 MB/s
4K Read 17.6
4K Write 12.2
4K Mixed 11.4
48% 13.7 MB/s
DQ Read 158
DQ Write 311
DQ Mixed 1.6
67% 157 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 48.3%
Great: 95%
Addlink M.2 PCIE G3x4 NVMe RGB 1TB
954GB free
Firmware: ECFM22.7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1874 902 853 744 766 753 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
145% Outstanding
Read 900
Write 910
Mixed 648
SusWrite 982
194% 860 MB/s
4K Read 10.8
4K Write 90.8
4K Mixed 22.4
93% 41.3 MB/s
DQ Read 50.4
DQ Write 910
DQ Mixed 64
174% 342 MB/s
Poor: 147%
This bench: 145%
Great: 317%
Seagate Desktop HDD 4TB (2013)-$61
265GB free
Firmware: CC52
SusWrite @10s intervals: 75 88 92 93 93 88 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
53.2% Above average
Read 97.2
Write 59.5
Mixed 56.5
SusWrite 88.2
56% 75.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.5
101% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 53.2%
Great: 96%
General UDisk 32GB
25GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.9 7.5 2.7 4.5 6.3 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
6.8% Terrible
Read 19
Write 3
Mixed 14.7
SusWrite 6.3
13% 10.8 MB/s
4K Read 7.4
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 0.4
51% 2.7 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 6.8%
Great: 10%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 4000 C18 2x8GB
2 of 8 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 4000 MHz
Performing below potential (29th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
82.8% Excellent
MC Read 31.1
MC Write 40.4
MC Mixed 23.5
90% 31.7 GB/s
SC Read 9.8
SC Write 22.5
SC Mixed 11.8
42% 14.7 GB/s
Latency 66.6
60% 66.6 ns
Poor: 64%
This bench: 82.8%
Great: 121%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 9 7 60 23" 1280 720 HWP3115 HP S230tm
Typical ROG RAMPAGE VI EXTREME ENCORE Builds (Compare 388 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 176%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 222%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG RAMPAGE VI EXTREME ENCORE

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 53% - Above average Total price: $2,346
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i7-14700K $355Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback