PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 41.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average. |
Graphics | 48.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 63.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Intel X79 (all builds) |
Memory | 28.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20191015 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Jul 06 '21 at 17:44 |
Run Duration | 207 Seconds |
Run User | DEU-User |
Background CPU | 9% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Xeon E5-2650 v2
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 1.3 GHz (avg)
|
41.4%
Average
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
CLim: 1455 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 466.77
Performing below potential (47th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
48.5%
Average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 850 Evo 120GB-$80
28GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 288 117 121 134 133 121 MB/s
|
63.6%
Good
|
|||
Samsung MZVLQ256HAJD-000H1 256GB
147GB free
Firmware: HPS4NFXV
SusWrite @10s intervals: 599 695 871 176 180 180 MB/s
|
107%
Outstanding
|
|||
Samsung HD502HJ 500GB-$50
367GB free
Firmware: 1AJ10001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 132 131 139 134 133 133 MB/s
|
75.8%
Very good
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung M393B1K70DH0- 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
|
37.6%
Below average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware
Score | Hit Rate | Shots | EFps | 0.1% Low | Refresh Rate | Screen | Resolution | Monitor |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
29% | 14% | 78 | 302 | 225 | 60 | 23.8" | 1920 1080 | HWP3320 HP 24es |
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Xeon E5-2689 0IntelBench 71%, 6,987 samples | 348x |
Xeon E5-2650 v2IntelBench 67%, 5,123 samples | 278x |
Xeon E5-2640 0IntelBench 65%, 3,274 samples | 151x |
GPU | |
---|---|
RX 570AMD $170Bench 45%, 473,685 samples | 129x |
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 118x |
GTX 1060-3GBNvidia $119Bench 52%, 627,793 samples | 113x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 57% - Above average | Total price: $195 |