Today's hottest deals

Asus PRIME Z270-P

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 32%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics28.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive96.2% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus PRIME Z270-P  (all builds)
Memory7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170707
Uptime3.4 Days
Run DateJul 05 '21 at 06:21
Run Duration157 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 15%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700K-$148
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
89.1% Excellent
Memory 92.6
1-Core 130
2-Core 271
91% 165 Pts
4-Core 461
8-Core 749
74% 605 Pts
64-Core 722
45% 722 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 89.1%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
Asus(1043 8613) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing below potential (35th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
28.4% Poor
Lighting 35.7
Reflection 39.9
Parallax 37.2
29% 37.6 fps
MRender 37.8
Gravity 37.8
Splatting 26.4
27% 34 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 28.4%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Apacer AS340 240GB
45GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Q0526A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 305 340 218 123 124 105 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
96.2% Outstanding
Read 439
Write 395
Mixed 335
SusWrite 203
77% 343 MB/s
4K Read 28.9
4K Write 110
4K Mixed 48.3
164% 62.3 MB/s
DQ Read 350
DQ Write 336
DQ Mixed 103
143% 263 MB/s
Poor: 73%
This bench: 96.2%
Great: 113%
WD Blue 320GB (2007)-$26
128GB free
Firmware: 12.01C02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 57 64 64 64 65 64 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
36.2% Below average
Read 62.6
Write 61
Mixed 45.4
SusWrite 62.8
43% 58 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1
185% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 36.2%
Great: 58%
Seagate FreeAgent GoFlex 1TB
615GB free, PID 5021
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 16 15 15 16 15 16 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
8.04% Terrible
Read 27.2
Write 16.4
Mixed 8
SusWrite 15.3
20% 16.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 0.2
4K Mixed 0.2
16% 0.33 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 8.04%
Great: 38%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Apacer 78.CAGP7.AZ20B 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
74.4% Very good
MC Read 28.1
MC Write 28.7
MC Mixed 21.6
75% 26.1 GB/s
SC Read 17
SC Write 27.3
SC Mixed 23.7
65% 22.7 GB/s
Latency 63
64% 63 ns
Poor: 74%
This bench: 74.4%
Great: 80%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 9 7 60 21.5" 1280 720 ACI22FA VE228
Typical PRIME Z270-P Builds (Compare 6,725 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 71%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 61%
Destroyer

Motherboard: Asus PRIME Z270-P - $140

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 73% - Very good Total price: $708
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $230Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback