Today's hottest deals

HP ProBook 430 G4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics4.76% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive38.9% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
CPU throttled at 92% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
SystemHP ProBook 430 G4  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 822C
Memory4.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190415
Uptime12.3 Days
Run DateJul 01 '21 at 20:09
Run Duration251 Seconds
Run User HRV-User
Background CPU2%
CPU Throttled 92%

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7200U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
62.8% Good
Memory 85.6
1-Core 93.7
2-Core 166
68% 115 Pts
4-Core 236
8-Core 225
31% 231 Pts
64-Core 262
16% 262 Pts
Poor: 20%
This bench: 62.8%
Great: 58%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake)
HP(103C 822C) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8681
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
4.76% Terrible
Lighting 7.4
Reflection 3.4
Parallax 6.6
6% 5.8 fps
MRender 0.2
Gravity 8.9
Splatting 0.1
2% 3.07 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.76%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Transcend TS240GMTS820S 240GB
100GB free (System drive)
Firmware: R0327B0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 21 290 205 142 50 141 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
38.9% Below average
Read 427
Write 17.2
Mixed 27.3
SusWrite 141
33% 153 MB/s
4K Read 29.7
4K Write 7.6
4K Mixed 0.4
50% 12.6 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 38.9%
Great: 89%
WD WD5000LPLX-00ZNTT0 500GB
180GB free
Firmware: 05.01A05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 107 98 108 108 107 109 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
59.7% Above average
Read 101
Write 89.4
Mixed 48.6
SusWrite 106
63% 86.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.7
141% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 59.7%
Great: 82%
Verbatim STORE N GO 64GB
50GB free, PID 0251
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.5 6.6 5.7 6.1 6.9 7.3 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
3.1% Terrible
Read 8.4
Write 6
Mixed 9.5
SusWrite 7
10% 7.72 MB/s
4K Read 1.5
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
6% 0.5 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.1%
Great: 7%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 4ATF51264HZ-2G3B1 - [0x9B85] CT4G4SFS8266.C8FF 8GB
2133, 2133 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
61.8% Good
MC Read 23.2
MC Write 24.2
MC Mixed 19.3
64% 22.2 GB/s
SC Read 13.9
SC Write 17.1
SC Mixed 16.5
45% 15.8 GB/s
Latency 71.5
56% 71.5 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 20: 2R 3G 1B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
20% 50% 12 53 13 60 13.2" 1366 768 AUO162C
History: Score 0: 0R 0G 0B | Score 20: 2R 3G 1B
Typical ProBook 430 G4 Builds (Compare 333 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: HP ProBook 430 G4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $239Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback