| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing above expectations (81st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 19 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good. |
| Graphics | 68.5% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels. |
| Boot Drive | 88.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
| Memory | 128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
| System | Supermicro X10SRA-F (all builds) |
| Motherboard | Supermicro X10SRA-F |
| Memory | 123.8 GB free of 128 GB @ 2.1 GHz |
| Display | 3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20181024 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Jun 30 '21 at 22:47 |
| Run Duration | 190 Seconds |
| Run User | USA-User |
| Background CPU | 1% |
PC Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Xeon E5-2690 v4
CPU1, 1 CPU, 14 cores, 28 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
|
81.6%
Excellent
|
79% 140 Pts
|
74% 626 Pts
|
120% 1,935 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia Quadro P4000
Nvidia(10DE 11A3) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1708 MHz, MLim: 1901 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 471.11
Performing below potential (74th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
68.5%
Good
|
65% 85.8 fps
|
75% 90.9 fps
| |
| Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Crucial MX200 1TB-$270
721GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MU03
SusWrite @10s intervals: 390 378 388 382 395 401 MB/s
|
88.3%
Excellent
|
83% 368 MB/s
|
142% 53.4 MB/s
|
69% 99.6 MB/s
|
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung M386A4G40DM0-CPB 4x31.8GB
4 of 8 slots used
127GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
|
129%
Outstanding
|
148% 51.7 GB/s
|
49% 17.1 GB/s
|
55% 73.3 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)
Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware
| Score | Hit Rate | Shots | EFps | 0.1% Low | Refresh Rate | Screen | Resolution | Monitor |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0% | 0% | 17 | 354 | 294 | 60 | 27.2" | 2560 1440 | GSM5B09 LG Ultra HD |
Typical X10SRA-F Builds (Compare 22 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
System: Supermicro X10SRA-F
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Xeon E5-1650 v4IntelBench 83%, 3,842 samples | 6x |
| Xeon E5-2620 v4IntelBench 68%, 1,471 samples | 4x |
| Core i7-5820KIntel $130Bench 77%, 101,694 samples | 1x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 3x |
| RX 550AMD $79Bench 14%, 79,894 samples | 2x |
| Quadro K4000NvidiaBench 13%, 11,114 samples | 1x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 48% - Average | Total price: $332 |