Today's hottest deals

Acer Aspire X1301

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 39%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 41.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics3.08% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (52%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemAcer Aspire X1301  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer WMCP78M
Memory1.2 GB free of 4 GB @ 2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20091106
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 27 '21 at 20:46
Run Duration287 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 52%

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon II X2 215-$29
Socket AM2 , 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
41.9% Average
Memory 74.9
1-Core 35.8
2-Core 66.9
41% 59.2 Pts
4-Core 52.5
8-Core 71.3
8% 61.9 Pts
64-Core 60.7
4% 60.7 Pts
Poor: 27%
This bench: 41.9%
Great: 47%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 320
Sapphire(174B 2150) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 341.74
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
3.08% Terrible
Lighting 3.9
Reflection 1.6
Parallax 1.9
3% 2.47 fps
MRender 4.9
Gravity 3.1
Splatting 2.9
3% 3.63 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.08%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Green 1TB (2009)-$72
621GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 5.5 58 57 63 56 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
16.7% Very poor
Read 15.3
Write 43.1
Mixed 20
SusWrite 43.1
22% 30.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 0.2
4K Mixed 0.1
19% 0.13 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 16.7%
Great: 57%
Generic- SM/xD/SD/MMC/MS 8GB
7GB free, PID 0151
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 16 17 17 17 17 17 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
19.4% Very poor
Read 14.5
Write 16.2
Mixed 15
SusWrite 16.5
22% 15.6 MB/s
4K Read 3.3
4K Write 4.2
4K Mixed 2.6
244% 3.37 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 19.4%
Great: 19%
SanDisk Ultra 16GB
14GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 9.7 9.5 9.9 10 10 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
11.1% Very poor
Read 27.9
Write 15.3
Mixed 19.5
SusWrite 10.5
23% 18.3 MB/s
4K Read 4.4
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 1.4
105% 2.33 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 11.1%
Great: 36%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x2GB
2 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR2
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
22.7% Poor
MC Read 8.2
MC Write 6.3
MC Mixed 8.1
22% 7.53 GB/s
SC Read 4.3
SC Write 5.4
SC Mixed 5.4
14% 5.03 GB/s
Latency 90.6
44% 90.6 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 22.7%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 7 5 60 24.5" 1280 720 AUS25A1 VG255
Typical Aspire X1301 Builds (Compare 19 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 40%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire X1301

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i7-14700K $355Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback