PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
Graphics | 27.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 87.9% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
Memory | 12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Asus P8P67 LE (all builds) |
Memory | 8.1 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
Display | 3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20130912 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Jun 26 '21 at 12:50 |
Run Duration | 200 Seconds |
Run User | ROU-User |
Background CPU | 1% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i7-3770-$297
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
|
72.3%
Very good
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing below potential (35th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
27.8%
Poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
54GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 294 168 161 153 146 146 MB/s
|
87.9%
Excellent
|
|||
WD Blue 1TB (2010)-$68
628GB free
Firmware: 15.01H15
SusWrite @10s intervals: 83 90 90 91 92 90 MB/s
|
43.4%
Average
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Unknown CMX4GX3M2A1600C9 029E CMX8GX3M2A1600C9 029E CMX4GX3M2A1600C9 029E CMX8GX3M2A1600C9 12GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 4096, 2048, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (9th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
47.2%
Average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware
Score | Hit Rate | Shots | EFps | 0.1% Low | Refresh Rate | Screen | Resolution | Monitor |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
39% | 16% | 83 | 162 | 102 | 60 | 49" | 2560 1440 | SNY7E04 SONY TV *00 |
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i5-2500KIntel $246Bench 66%, 143,007 samples | 323x |
Core i7-2600Intel $157Bench 67%, 185,630 samples | 232x |
Core i7-2600KIntel $319Bench 71%, 147,533 samples | 218x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples | 88x |
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 86x |
GTX 1070Nvidia $278Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples | 77x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 58% - Above average | Total price: $639 |