Today's hottest deals

Acer Aspire E5-722

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 23%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 24.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics1.87% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (26%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAcer Aspire E5-722  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Aspire E5-722
Memory5 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160310
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 22 '21 at 15:31
Run Duration229 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 26%

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD E2-7110 APU (2015 M.Ca)
Socket FP4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 1.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
24.2% Poor
Memory 37.7
1-Core 24.6
2-Core 49.2
24% 37.2 Pts
4-Core 61.4
8-Core 76.2
9% 68.8 Pts
64-Core 105
6% 105 Pts
Poor: 18%
This bench: 24.2%
Great: 35%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R2 Graphics
Acer(1025 097D) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 21.5.2
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
1.87% Terrible
Lighting 2
Reflection 4
Parallax 2.8
2% 2.93 fps
MRender 2.9
Gravity 1.8
Splatting 3.6
2% 2.77 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.87%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 2.5" 1TB (2004)-$39
896GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 108 108 107 105 105 107 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
59.6% Above average
Read 101
Write 105
Mixed 62.8
SusWrite 107
69% 93.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.7
133% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 59.6%
Great: 62%
JetFlash Transcend 32GB
30GB free, PID 6387
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 19 19 19 19 18 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
9.43% Terrible
Read 23.9
Write 18.7
Mixed 8.5
SusWrite 18.8
22% 17.5 MB/s
4K Read 7.9
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
29% 2.63 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 9.43%
Great: 10%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston ACR16D3LS1KNG/8G 1x8GB
1 of 1 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 800 MHz
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
16.8% Very poor
MC Read 6.9
MC Write 4
MC Mixed 6.7
17% 5.87 GB/s
SC Read 4.3
SC Write 3.9
SC Mixed 5.3
13% 4.5 GB/s
Latency 213
19% 213 ns
Poor: 17%
This bench: 16.8%
Great: 33%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 8 6 60 17.2" 1280 720 CMN1734
Typical Aspire E5-722 Builds (Compare 6 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 32%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire E5-722

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $230Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback