Today's hottest deals

Hp-pavilion KQ497AA-ABA m9340f

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 39%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 46.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics1.67% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 2 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemHp-pavilion KQ497AA-ABA m9340f  (all builds)
MotherboardPEGATRON Benicia
Memory3.6 GB free of 6 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20080730
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 21 '21 at 16:39
Run Duration130 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 Quad Q6700-$192
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.65 GHz
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
46.8% Average
Memory 73.1
1-Core 30
2-Core 61.5
38% 54.9 Pts
4-Core 122
8-Core 122
16% 122 Pts
64-Core 122
8% 122 Pts
Poor: 35%
This bench: 46.8%
Great: 50%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 9500 GS
MSI(1462 1330) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 311.06
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
1.67% Terrible
Lighting 2.2
Reflection 4.7
Parallax 0.9
2% 2.6 fps
MRender 4
Gravity 1.8
Splatting 0.2
1% 2 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 1.67%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$22
390GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1H15
SusWrite @10s intervals: 84 109 72 110 111 111 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
60.9% Good
Read 112
Write 114
Mixed 66.8
SusWrite 99.7
72% 98.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.9
161% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 60.9%
Great: 69%
WD My Book 640GB
534GB free, PID 1100
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 29 29 29 29 29 29 MB/s
Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
18.1% Very poor
Read 31.8
Write 28.2
Mixed 25.3
SusWrite 29
38% 28.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.8
107% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 18.1%
Great: 22%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 6GB
null MHz
2048, 1024, 2048, 1024 MB
Performing below potential (35th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
18% Very poor
MC Read 6.6
MC Write 4.7
MC Mixed 5
16% 5.43 GB/s
SC Read 5.9
SC Write 4.8
SC Mixed 5.7
16% 5.47 GB/s
Latency 94.5
42% 94.5 ns
Poor: 12%
This bench: 18%
Great: 46%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical KQ497AA-ABA m9340f Builds (Compare 4 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 40%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk

System: Hp-pavilion KQ497AA-ABA m9340f

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 45% - Average Total price: $217
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $230Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback