Today's hottest deals

HP CQ1-1320BR

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (8th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 92 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 9.56%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemHP CQ1-1320BR  (all builds)
MotherboardPEGATRON 1492
Memory2.3 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100715
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 17 '21 at 23:19
Run Duration137 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Atom D510-$115
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.65 GHz, turbo 1.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
9.56% Terrible
Memory 15.9
1-Core 5.6
2-Core 11.5
8% 11 Pts
4-Core 19
8-Core 20.8
3% 19.9 Pts
64-Core 20.9
1% 20.9 Pts
Poor: 10%
This bench: 9.56%
Great: 25%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate ST380211AS 80GB
48GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3.AAE
SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 9.7 29 42 37 32 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
14.1% Very poor
Read 21.7
Write 30.7
Mixed 11.9
SusWrite 27.4
17% 22.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 0.1
21% 0.13 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 14.1%
Great: 40%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x2GB
2 of 2 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR2
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
8.72% Terrible
MC Read 3.6
MC Write 2.7
MC Mixed 3
9% 3.1 GB/s
SC Read 1.7
SC Write 1.7
SC Mixed 2.2
5% 1.87 GB/s
Latency 352
11% 352 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 8.72%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $239Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback