Today's hottest deals

Asus Vivo AIO 24 V241FA_V241FA

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (81st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 19 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics4.49% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive86.2% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 91% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
SystemAsus Vivo AIO 24 V241FA_V241FA  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK V241FA
Memory4.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190722
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 16 '21 at 11:20
Run Duration112 Seconds
Run User ROU-User
Background CPU 14%
CPU Throttled 91%

 PC Performing above expectations (81st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-8145U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
66.5% Good
Memory 76.3
1-Core 123
2-Core 189
75% 130 Pts
4-Core 329
8-Core 329
44% 329 Pts
64-Core 328
20% 328 Pts
Poor: 28%
This bench: 66.5%
Great: 66%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 620
Asus(1043 17B1) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.7810
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
4.49% Terrible
Lighting 6
Reflection 5.4
Parallax 6.9
5% 6.1 fps
MRender 9.4
Gravity 6
Splatting 0.2
4% 5.2 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.49%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HFS256G39TNH-73A0A 256GB
202GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 90000Q00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 361 144 151 148 147 149 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
86.2% Excellent
Read 444
Write 389
Mixed 372
SusWrite 184
78% 347 MB/s
4K Read 31.4
4K Write 86.7
4K Mixed 41.4
146% 53.2 MB/s
DQ Read 227
DQ Write 306
DQ Mixed 263
200% 265 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 86.2%
Great: 86%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA851S6AFR6N-UH 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
67.5% Good
MC Read 25.3
MC Write 25.5
MC Mixed 20.7
68% 23.8 GB/s
SC Read 16
SC Write 25.9
SC Mixed 23.5
62% 21.8 GB/s
Latency 87.7
46% 87.7 ns
Poor: 22%
This bench: 67.5%
Great: 71%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Vivo AIO 24 V241FA_V241FA Builds (Compare 58 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 53%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: Asus Vivo AIO 24 V241FA_V241FA

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $230Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback