Today's hottest deals

Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 43%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 49%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 94%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics37.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive173% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)  (all builds)
Memory25.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit kleuren
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210407
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 16 '21 at 06:31
Run Duration158 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 570 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X-$335
AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 4.3 GHz, turbo 4.25 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
94% Outstanding
Memory 74.1
1-Core 152
2-Core 306
94% 177 Pts
4-Core 609
8-Core 1,205
107% 907 Pts
64-Core 2,293
142% 2,293 Pts
Poor: 80%
This bench: 94%
Great: 97%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 570-$170
Gigabyte(1458 230F) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1244 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 21.5.2
Performing below potential (9th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
37.8% Below average
Lighting 44.2
Reflection 58.8
Parallax 69.1
36% 57.4 fps
MRender 58.7
Gravity 53.2
Splatting 42.8
41% 51.6 fps
Poor: 37%
This bench: 37.8%
Great: 49%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$105
820GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 321 285 280 289 332 290 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
173% Outstanding
Read 2,492
Write 897
Mixed 1,147
SusWrite 299
265% 1,209 MB/s
4K Read 62.4
4K Write 25.7
4K Mixed 24.3
139% 37.5 MB/s
DQ Read 614
DQ Write 29.2
DQ Mixed 130
143% 258 MB/s
Poor: 214%
This bench: 173%
Great: 372%
Intel 330 Series 240GB
176GB free
Firmware: 300i
SusWrite @10s intervals: 176 179 180 178 182 175 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
52.8% Above average
Read 423
Write 184
Mixed 241
SusWrite 178
57% 257 MB/s
4K Read 24.1
4K Write 15.3
4K Mixed 17.3
67% 18.9 MB/s
DQ Read 150
DQ Write 60.4
DQ Mixed 73.7
63% 94.5 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 52.8%
Great: 91%
Toshiba DT01ACA200 2TB-$40
1.5TB free
Firmware: MX4O
SusWrite @10s intervals: 47 48 48 48 46 48 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 49% Great: 108%
Hitachi Deskstar 7K1000.C 1TB-$88
834GB free
Firmware: JP4O
SusWrite @10s intervals: 128 131 132 132 127 131 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
73.1% Very good
Read 125
Write 123
Mixed 70.6
SusWrite 130
82% 112 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.8
150% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 73.1%
Great: 74%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMK16GX4M2Z2400C16 Kingston 9905678-138.A00G CMK16GX4M2Z2400C16 Kingston 9905678-042.A00G 32GB
2400, 2400, 2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
86% Excellent
MC Read 34
MC Write 30.3
MC Mixed 30.9
91% 31.7 GB/s
SC Read 23.4
SC Write 17.9
SC Mixed 29.9
68% 23.7 GB/s
Latency 92.3
43% 92.3 ns
Poor: 71%
This bench: 86%
Great: 86%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 26,726 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) - $180

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 90% - Outstanding Total price: $954
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $239Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback