Today's hottest deals

Default string

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 28%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (25th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 75 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 26.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics1.41% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive38.1% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (44%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemDefault string  (all builds)
MotherboardDefault Default string
Memory3.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201229
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 14 '21 at 18:21
Run Duration123 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 44%

 PC Performing below expectations (25th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron J4115
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 1.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
26.9% Poor
Memory 28.9
1-Core 50.9
2-Core 84.6
31% 54.8 Pts
4-Core 142
8-Core 157
20% 149 Pts
64-Core 150
9% 150 Pts
Poor: 24%
This bench: 26.9%
Great: 39%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 600
Intel(8086 2212) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.9466
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
1.41% Terrible
Lighting 1.4
Reflection 1.6
Parallax 1.5
1% 1.5 fps
MRender 4.5
Gravity 3.5
Splatting 0.1
2% 2.7 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.41%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
ShanDianZhe-256GB 256GB
194GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S0411A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 80 79 77 76 90 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
38.1% Below average
Read 288
Write 66
Mixed 182
SusWrite 83.6
34% 155 MB/s
4K Read 10
4K Write 20.8
4K Mixed 13.6
44% 14.8 MB/s
DQ Read 161
DQ Write 191
DQ Mixed 40.8
68% 131 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 38.1%
Great: 83%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
ABCD 123456789012345678 4x2GB
4 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM LPDDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
22% Poor
MC Read 6.7
MC Write 9.3
MC Mixed 9.4
24% 8.47 GB/s
SC Read 2.5
SC Write 4.5
SC Mixed 4.1
11% 3.7 GB/s
Latency 261
15% 261 ns
Poor: 14%
This bench: 22%
Great: 29%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical string Builds (Compare 15,311 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard

System: Default string

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 90% - Excellent Total price: $84
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i7-14700K $355Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback