Today's hottest deals

MSI MAG B550 TOMAHAWK (MS-7C91)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 128%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 128%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics148% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C91
MotherboardMSI MAG B550 TOMAHAWK (MS-7C91)  (all builds)
Memory23.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200701
Uptime2.2 Days
Run DateJun 14 '21 at 16:23
Run Duration125 Seconds
Run User NOR-User
Background CPU7%
Watch Gameplay: 3070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 3800XT-$352
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 4.25 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
89.7% Excellent
Memory 73.6
1-Core 156
2-Core 301
94% 177 Pts
4-Core 567
8-Core 943
92% 755 Pts
64-Core 1,361
84% 1,361 Pts
Poor: 77%
This bench: 89.7%
Great: 98%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3070-$470
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 461.92
Performing below potential (46th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
148% Outstanding
Lighting 216
Reflection 205
Parallax 190
176% 203 fps
MRender 194
Gravity 152
Splatting 132
127% 160 fps
Poor: 135%
This bench: 148%
Great: 158%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Ramsta R900 M.2 NVMe SSD 512GB
46GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RI24V0 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,555
Write 1,338
Mixed 986
287% 1,293 MB/s
4K Read 47.9
4K Write 178
4K Mixed 29.8
205% 85.3 MB/s
DQ Read 870
DQ Write 986
DQ Mixed 248
375% 701 MB/s
Poor: 102% Great: 267%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$30
860GB free
Firmware: MS2OA750
SusWrite @10s intervals: 173 173 176 185 185 185 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
93.2% Outstanding
Read 146
Write 171
Mixed 35
SusWrite 180
96% 133 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.7
146% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 93.2%
Great: 107%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown DDR4-3200 C16 8GB 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
76.7% Very good
MC Read 31.4
MC Write 19.9
MC Mixed 31.1
78% 27.5 GB/s
SC Read 23.5
SC Write 19.6
SC Mixed 30.1
70% 24.4 GB/s
Latency 93.2
43% 93.2 ns
Poor: 77%
This bench: 76.7%
Great: 115%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MAG B550 TOMAHAWK (MS-7C91) Builds (Compare 18,212 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 142%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI MAG B550 TOMAHAWK (MS-7C91) - $130

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 93% - Outstanding Total price: $863
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $390WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $85
Intel Core i5-13600K $215Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback