Today's hottest deals

MSI Z97 GAMING 5 (MS-7917)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 90.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics69.4% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
3 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemMSI MS-7917
MotherboardMSI Z97 GAMING 5 (MS-7917)  (all builds)
Memory10.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160216
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateJun 13 '21 at 15:29
Run Duration125 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (69th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4790K-$348
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
90.9% Outstanding
Memory 96.9
1-Core 126
2-Core 255
90% 159 Pts
4-Core 458
8-Core 659
70% 558 Pts
64-Core 686
42% 686 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 90.9%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX Titan X-$615
Nvidia(10DE 1132) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1392 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 461.40
Performing below potential (13th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
69.4% Good
Lighting 83.4
Reflection 120
Parallax 77.5
68% 93.7 fps
MRender 90.8
Gravity 92
Splatting 83.7
72% 88.8 fps
Poor: 68%
This bench: 69.4%
Great: 83%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hitachi HDT725050VLA360 250GB
37GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0BB6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 260 65 56 45 38 38 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Read 505
Write 457
Mixed 366
SusWrite 83.7
79% 353 MB/s
4K Read 44.3
4K Write 52.9
4K Mixed 43.1
150% 46.8 MB/s
DQ Read 376
DQ Write 95.3
DQ Mixed 181
148% 218 MB/s
Samsung 840 EVO 250GB
1TB free
Firmware: CC25
SusWrite @10s intervals: 177 174 176 178 180 181 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Read 175
Write 151
Mixed 82.3
SusWrite 178
33% 147 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
3% 1 MB/s
Poor: 79% Great: 130%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL RipjawsX DDR3 2133 C11 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
79.4% Very good
MC Read 29.1
MC Write 29.1
MC Mixed 24.8
79% 27.7 GB/s
SC Read 20.7
SC Write 24.3
SC Mixed 25.1
67% 23.4 GB/s
Latency 50.5
79% 50.5 ns
Poor: 46%
This bench: 79.4%
Great: 79%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z97 GAMING 5 (MS-7917) Builds (Compare 7,069 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: MSI Z97 GAMING 5 (MS-7917)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Above average Total price: $648
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $78
Intel Core i5-13600K $226Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback