Today's hottest deals

Samsung 905S3G/906S3G/915S3G

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 20%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 19.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics0.97% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive51.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (56%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemSamsung 905S3G/906S3G/915S3G  (all builds)
MotherboardSAMSUNG NP905S3G-K08AT
Memory1.5 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140409
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 09 '21 at 14:40
Run Duration130 Seconds
Run User AUT-User
Background CPU 56%

 PC Performing below expectations (34th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Quad-Core Processor (up to 1.4GHz)
P0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1 GHz, turbo 1 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
19.4% Very poor
Memory 29
1-Core 15.1
2-Core 30.7
17% 24.9 Pts
4-Core 57.5
8-Core 59
8% 58.2 Pts
64-Core 53.1
3% 53.1 Pts
Poor: 10%
This bench: 19.4%
Great: 28%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD HD 8250
Sanyo(144D C730) 512MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.200.1065.0
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
0.97% Terrible
Lighting 1
Reflection 2.2
Parallax 1.6
1% 1.6 fps
MRender 2
Gravity 0.5
Splatting 2
1% 1.5 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 0.97%
Great: 1%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Liteonit LMT-128M6M 128GB
25GB free (System drive)
Firmware: DM72002
SusWrite @10s intervals: 249 168 255 267 248 265 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
51.4% Above average
Read 334
Write 273
Mixed 201
SusWrite 242
59% 262 MB/s
4K Read 16.5
4K Write 24.2
4K Mixed 17
60% 19.2 MB/s
DQ Read 101
DQ Write 115
DQ Mixed 92
74% 103 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 51.4%
Great: 88%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron EBJ40UG8EFU0-GN-F 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1066 MHz
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
9.9% Terrible
MC Read 4.2
MC Write 2.3
MC Mixed 3.5
10% 3.33 GB/s
SC Read 2.3
SC Write 2.1
SC Mixed 3.4
7% 2.6 GB/s
Latency 260
15% 260 ns
Poor: 6%
This bench: 9.9%
Great: 14%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 905S3G/906S3G/915S3G Builds (Compare 28 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 22%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Samsung 905S3G/906S3G/915S3G

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $78
Intel Core i5-13600K $226Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback