Today's hottest deals

Default string

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 36%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 39.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics0.55% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive46.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (48%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemDefault string  (all builds)
MotherboardAMI Aptio CRB
Memory1.1 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201023
Uptime1.6 Days
Run DateJun 09 '21 at 13:40
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User BHR-User
Background CPU 48%

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron J1900
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
39.9% Below average
Memory 67.4
1-Core 22.7
2-Core 44.6
33% 44.9 Pts
4-Core 74.1
8-Core 82.1
10% 78.1 Pts
64-Core 85.9
5% 85.9 Pts
Poor: 27%
This bench: 39.9%
Great: 40%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail 0.667 - 0.854 GHz)
Intel(8086 2212) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4425
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
0.55% Terrible
Lighting 0.4
Reflection 0.9
Parallax 0.7
0% 0.67 fps
MRender 1.5
Gravity 0.8
Splatting 1.3
1% 1.2 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.55%
Great: 1%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hoodisk SSD 128GB
98GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFMP1.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 175 152 61 61 59 67 MB/s
Performing below potential (9th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
46.5% Average
Read 225
Write 202
Mixed 170
SusWrite 96
39% 173 MB/s
4K Read 21.9
4K Write 32.7
4K Mixed 23
80% 25.9 MB/s
DQ Read 168
DQ Write 142
DQ Mixed 112
96% 141 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 46.5%
Great: 93%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT351S6CFR8C-PB 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (17th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
20.3% Poor
MC Read 6.8
MC Write 7.6
MC Mixed 6.8
20% 7.07 GB/s
SC Read 2.8
SC Write 4.9
SC Mixed 2.6
10% 3.43 GB/s
Latency 108
37% 108 ns
Poor: 12%
This bench: 20.3%
Great: 33%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical string Builds (Compare 15,327 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: Default string

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 23% - Poor Total price: $25
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $226Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback