Today's hottest deals

TIMI Mi NoteBook 14

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 44.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics15.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive48.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 76% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
SystemTIMI Mi NoteBook 14  (all builds)
MotherboardTIMI TM1901
Memory4 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200401
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJun 07 '21 at 07:52
Run Duration116 Seconds
Run User IND-User
Background CPU 15%
CPU Throttled 76%

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-10210U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 1.7 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
44.6% Average
Memory 66
1-Core 103
2-Core 192
67% 120 Pts
4-Core 127
8-Core 241
22% 184 Pts
64-Core 233
14% 233 Pts
Poor: 26%
This bench: 44.6%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce MX250
Device(1D72 1901) 2GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 27.21.14.5730
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
15.4% Very poor
Lighting 19.3
Reflection 18.5
Parallax 18.7
16% 18.8 fps
MRender 18.3
Gravity 20
Splatting 16.6
15% 18.3 fps
Poor: 9%
This bench: 15.4%
Great: 16%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston MS80000059188 512GB
307GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFK61D1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 276 178 89 93 68 27 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
48.4% Average
Read 316
Write 259
Mixed 250
SusWrite 122
53% 237 MB/s
4K Read 17.1
4K Write 33.1
4K Mixed 11.5
58% 20.6 MB/s
DQ Read 191
DQ Write 313
DQ Mixed 186
160% 230 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 48.4%
Great: 75%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1G44AB0-CTD 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
37.2% Below average
MC Read 15.5
MC Write 11.8
MC Mixed 9.7
35% 12.3 GB/s
SC Read 13.4
SC Write 14.8
SC Mixed 13.9
40% 14 GB/s
Latency 111
36% 111 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 37.2%
Great: 40%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Mi NoteBook 14 Builds (Compare 218 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: TIMI Mi NoteBook 14

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $239Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback