Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte X570 AORUS MASTER

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 106%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 106%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 99.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics104% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive243% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
MotherboardGigabyte X570 AORUS MASTER  (all builds)
Memory26.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200907
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 05 '21 at 03:29
Run Duration233 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU6%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 5800X-$122
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.6 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
99.8% Outstanding
Memory 81.8
1-Core 151
2-Core 322
98% 185 Pts
4-Core 630
8-Core 1,077
104% 854 Pts
64-Core 1,519
94% 1,519 Pts
Poor: 81%
This bench: 99.8%
Great: 111%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$195
CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 466.11
Performing below potential (71st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
104% Outstanding
Lighting 131
Reflection 142
Parallax 132
106% 135 fps
MRender 117
Gravity 138
Splatting 120
102% 125 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 104%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Black SN750 NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB (2019)-$110
354GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 111110WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1113 981 983 992 990 992 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
243% Outstanding
Read 1,683
Write 2,120
Mixed 1,294
SusWrite 1,009
344% 1,526 MB/s
4K Read 46.4
4K Write 157
4K Mixed 43.8
210% 82.5 MB/s
DQ Read 1,352
DQ Write 965
DQ Mixed 1,156
864% 1,157 MB/s
Poor: 168%
This bench: 243%
Great: 297%
Samsung 850 Pro 1TB-$175
93GB free
Firmware: EXM02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 371 304 293 288 264 264 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
94.4% Outstanding
Read 484
Write 428
Mixed 376
SusWrite 297
89% 396 MB/s
4K Read 32.6
4K Write 87.3
4K Mixed 45.2
154% 55 MB/s
DQ Read 220
DQ Write 187
DQ Mixed 203
152% 204 MB/s
Poor: 77%
This bench: 94.4%
Great: 124%
WD Black 2TB (2010)-$97
233GB free
Firmware: 05.01D05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 76 76 77 77 77 77 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
57.8% Above average
Read 124
Write 115
Mixed 100
SusWrite 76.6
77% 104 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 0.9
205% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 57.8%
Great: 85%
WD WUH721414ALE604 14TB
7.5TB free
Firmware: LDAZW110
SusWrite @10s intervals: 91 105 130 139 135 133 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
65.4% Good
Read 106
Write 114
Mixed 50.6
SusWrite 122
72% 98 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 1.4
212% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 65%
This bench: 65.4%
Great: 140%
SanDisk Cruzer 64GB
27GB free, PID 5530
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 14 13 12 12 12 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
15.7% Very poor
Read 35.1
Write 19.7
Mixed 10.7
SusWrite 13.1
23% 19.6 MB/s
4K Read 4.3
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 2.9
189% 3.13 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 15.7%
Great: 17%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 3600 C18 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2800 MHz
Performing below potential (32nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
82.8% Excellent
MC Read 34.9
MC Write 21
MC Mixed 31.6
83% 29.2 GB/s
SC Read 29
SC Write 21
SC Mixed 33.3
79% 27.8 GB/s
Latency 77.3
52% 77.3 ns
Poor: 65%
This bench: 82.8%
Great: 122%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-X570 AORUS MASTER Builds (Compare 5,145 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 184%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 201%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte X570 AORUS MASTER - $477

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 77% - Very good Total price: $1,522
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i7-14700K $355Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback