Performance Results


Gaming 3% Tree trunk	Desktop 34% Sail boat	Workstation 3% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 34.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	0.37% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	27.4% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.

High background CPU (26%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core2 Duo P8600-$42 8,502 User benchmarks, average bench 37% None, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.35 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)	34.8% Below average	Memory 60.9 1-Core 28.7 2-Core 52.1 33% 47.2 Pts	4-Core 53.4 8-Core 54 7% 53.7 Pts	64-Core 52.7 3% 52.7 Pts
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 34.8% Great: 42%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel Mobile Series 4 Express Chipset Family 23,924 User benchmarks, average bench 0% Legend(17AA 2113) 3.8GB Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 8.15.10.2702 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	0.37% Terrible	Lighting 0.5 Reflection 0.7 Parallax 0.4 0% 0.53 fps	MRender 0.5 Gravity 0.7 Splatting 0 0% 0.4 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.37% Great: 1%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston A400 120GB-$30 166,392 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 86GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFKB1E2 SusWrite @10s intervals: 81 95 98 90 MB/s Performing below potential (2^nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	27.4% Poor	Read 208 Write 76.2 Mixed 61 SusWrite 87.2 24% 108 MB/s	4K Read 13.2 4K Write 12.6 4K Mixed 9.6 39% 11.8 MB/s	DQ Read 31.9 DQ Write 54.3 DQ Mixed 63.8 42% 50 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 27.4% Great: 85%
Hitachi HTS723216L9SA60 160GB 711 User benchmarks, average bench 30% 149GB free Firmware: FC2ZC50B SusWrite @10s intervals: 76 76 75 60 76 77 MB/s Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	43.3% Average	Read 77.5 Write 79 Mixed 40.7 SusWrite 73.3 50% 67.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.1 4K Mixed 0.7 123% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 43.3% Great: 43%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x4GB 424,126 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 2 of 2 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR3 Performing below potential (5^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	14.8% Very poor	MC Read 5.2 MC Write 4.4 MC Mixed 4.3 13% 4.63 GB/s	SC Read 3.8 SC Write 4 SC Mixed 4.3 12% 4.03 GB/s	Latency 125 32% 125 ns
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 14.8% Great: 65%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM