Today's hottest deals

HP EliteBook 8760w

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics3.34% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory7GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 7GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemHP EliteBook 8760w  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 1630
Memory2.8 GB free of 7 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120615
Uptime2.3 Days
Run DateJun 01 '21 at 13:38
Run Duration145 Seconds
Run User IRN-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (68th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2670QM-$200
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
63.6% Good
Memory 84.2
1-Core 78.8
2-Core 152
63% 105 Pts
4-Core 239
8-Core 308
35% 274 Pts
64-Core 298
18% 298 Pts
Poor: 31%
This bench: 63.6%
Great: 67%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD FirePro M5950
HP(103C 1630) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1301.0
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
3.34% Terrible
Lighting 4.2
Reflection 4.8
Parallax 3.6
3% 4.2 fps
MRender 4.5
Gravity 3.3
Splatting 3.9
3% 3.9 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.34%
Great: 7%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba MQ01ABD050V 500GB
215GB free (System drive)
Firmware: AX0U1Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 101 101 98 100 99 100 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
57.9% Above average
Read 102
Write 94.9
Mixed 40.8
SusWrite 99.9
62% 84.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.5
98% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 57.9%
Great: 62%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 7GB
null MHz
2048, 1024, 2048, 2048 MB
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
43.7% Average
MC Read 15.5
MC Write 15.3
MC Mixed 13.5
42% 14.8 GB/s
SC Read 12.3
SC Write 13.9
SC Mixed 13.5
38% 13.2 GB/s
Latency 73
55% 73 ns
Poor: 12%
This bench: 43.7%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical EliteBook 8760w Builds (Compare 370 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: HP EliteBook 8760w

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 58% - Above average Total price: $277
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i7-14700K $355Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback