Today's hottest deals

Asrock Z77 Extreme3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics3.29% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive56.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsrock Z77 Extreme3  (all builds)
Memory25.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120810
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 30 '21 at 02:24
Run Duration174 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing below expectations (34th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3770K-$150
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
61.9% Good
Memory 76.6
1-Core 103
2-Core 183
70% 121 Pts
4-Core 260
8-Core 346
38% 303 Pts
64-Core 350
22% 350 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 61.9%
Great: 83%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 610
EVGA(3842 2616) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 327.23
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
1.74% Terrible
Lighting 2.1
Reflection 2.3
Parallax 0.7
2% 1.7 fps
MRender 2.4
Gravity 2.4
Splatting 1.9
2% 2.23 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 1.74%
Great: 2%
Intel HD 4000 (Desktop 1.15 GHz)-$15
ASRock(1849 0162) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4358
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
3.29% Terrible
Lighting 4
Reflection 1.9
Parallax 2.8
3% 2.9 fps
MRender 4.9
Gravity 2.3
Splatting 4.8
3% 4 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.29%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 120GB-$109
30GB free (System drive)
Firmware: DXT07B0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 113 112 119 103 103 86 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
56.4% Above average
Read 339
Write 110
Mixed 110
SusWrite 106
36% 166 MB/s
4K Read 24.3
4K Write 62.4
4K Mixed 16.6
91% 34.4 MB/s
DQ Read 325
DQ Write 109
DQ Mixed 37
74% 157 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 56.4%
Great: 73%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37
928GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 171 171 172 173 172 172 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
102% Outstanding
Read 184
Write 165
Mixed 96.5
SusWrite 172
113% 154 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 3
4K Mixed 0.9
206% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 102%
Great: 109%
Samsung Flash Drive DUO 128GB
9GB free, PID 1000
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 21 17 18 17 18 18 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
9.29% Terrible
Read 21.4
Write 16.2
Mixed 25.7
SusWrite 18.1
28% 20.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 1.5
76% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 9.29%
Great: 48%
Lexar JumpDrive S25 USB 3.0 16GB-$19
15GB free, PID a838
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 17 17 17 17 17 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
10.8% Very poor
Read 30.4
Write 17.9
Mixed 10.7
SusWrite 17.5
24% 19.1 MB/s
4K Read 3.2
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.6
53% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 10.8%
Great: 27%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair XMS3 DDR3 1600 C11 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
41.5% Average
MC Read 14.9
MC Write 14.2
MC Mixed 13.3
40% 14.1 GB/s
SC Read 11.7
SC Write 13.6
SC Mixed 13.5
37% 12.9 GB/s
Latency 87
46% 87 ns
Poor: 41%
This bench: 41.5%
Great: 59%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z77 Extreme3 Builds (Compare 289 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 37%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft

Motherboard: Asrock Z77 Extreme3 - $151

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Above average Total price: $525
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $226Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback